Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Risk and protective factors for IPV in low- and middle-income countries : A systematic review

Ghosal, Rakhi ; Duoard, Anne-Charlotte ; Sikder, Shefa ; Roy, Nobhojit and Saulnier, Dell LU orcid (2022) In Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma 32(4). p.505-522
Abstract
Low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a high burden of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, there are no reviews assimilating the factors affecting risk of IPV in LMICs. This systematic review (2010–20) identifies risk and protective factors of IPV in LMICs. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to review 399 studies and included 32 studies. Studies were of ever-partnered women living in an LMIC, aged 15 years and above, who had ever faced IPV from a male partner. Disaggregating factors using the ecological framework, we found that women less than 45 years of age face increased risk of IPV. Secondary and higher education levels of men lower the risk. Both employment and unemployment of women increase the risk. Male partner’s... (More)
Low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a high burden of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, there are no reviews assimilating the factors affecting risk of IPV in LMICs. This systematic review (2010–20) identifies risk and protective factors of IPV in LMICs. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to review 399 studies and included 32 studies. Studies were of ever-partnered women living in an LMIC, aged 15 years and above, who had ever faced IPV from a male partner. Disaggregating factors using the ecological framework, we found that women less than 45 years of age face increased risk of IPV. Secondary and higher education levels of men lower the risk. Both employment and unemployment of women increase the risk. Male partner’s dependence on alcohol or substances increases the risk. Prior exposure to abuse of either partner increases risk of IPV. Similarly, justification of wife-beating by any partner increases risk. Intimate relations which are more gender-equal experience lowered risk. Women who have no children, stay in smaller-sized families and reside in rural areas, face lower risks. The review found that risk factors outnumber protective factors. Protective factors are much more context-dependent, while risk factors are more universalizable for the LMIC world. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Violence against women, Gender-based violence, trigger, ecological model
in
Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma
volume
32
issue
4
pages
18 pages
publisher
Routledge
external identifiers
  • scopus:85144321487
ISSN
1092-6771
DOI
10.1080/10926771.2022.2154185
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
b6ae758d-1d62-4642-8a93-932adfcc2013
date added to LUP
2024-01-19 09:39:13
date last changed
2024-02-20 01:27:47
@article{b6ae758d-1d62-4642-8a93-932adfcc2013,
  abstract     = {{Low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a high burden of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, there are no reviews assimilating the factors affecting risk of IPV in LMICs. This systematic review (2010–20) identifies risk and protective factors of IPV in LMICs. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to review 399 studies and included 32 studies. Studies were of ever-partnered women living in an LMIC, aged 15 years and above, who had ever faced IPV from a male partner. Disaggregating factors using the ecological framework, we found that women less than 45 years of age face increased risk of IPV. Secondary and higher education levels of men lower the risk. Both employment and unemployment of women increase the risk. Male partner’s dependence on alcohol or substances increases the risk. Prior exposure to abuse of either partner increases risk of IPV. Similarly, justification of wife-beating by any partner increases risk. Intimate relations which are more gender-equal experience lowered risk. Women who have no children, stay in smaller-sized families and reside in rural areas, face lower risks. The review found that risk factors outnumber protective factors. Protective factors are much more context-dependent, while risk factors are more universalizable for the LMIC world.}},
  author       = {{Ghosal, Rakhi and Duoard, Anne-Charlotte and Sikder, Shefa and Roy, Nobhojit and Saulnier, Dell}},
  issn         = {{1092-6771}},
  keywords     = {{Violence against women; Gender-based violence; trigger; ecological model}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{12}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{505--522}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  series       = {{Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma}},
  title        = {{Risk and protective factors for IPV in low- and middle-income countries : A systematic review}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2022.2154185}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/10926771.2022.2154185}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}