Development of the 3-SET 4P questionnaire for evaluating former ICU patients' physical and psychosocial problems over time: A pilot study.
(2008) In Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Aug 7.- Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Current studies reveal a lack of consensus for the evaluation of physical and psychosocial problems after ICU stay and their changes over time. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for assessing physical and psychosocial problems over time for patients following ICU recovery. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine patients completed the questionnaire, 17 were retested. METHODS AND RESULTS: The questionnaire was constructed in three sets: physical problems, psychosocial problems and follow-up care. Face and content validity were tested by nurses, researchers and patients. The questionnaire showed good construct validity in all three sets and had strong factor loadings (explained variance... (More)
- BACKGROUND: Current studies reveal a lack of consensus for the evaluation of physical and psychosocial problems after ICU stay and their changes over time. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for assessing physical and psychosocial problems over time for patients following ICU recovery. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine patients completed the questionnaire, 17 were retested. METHODS AND RESULTS: The questionnaire was constructed in three sets: physical problems, psychosocial problems and follow-up care. Face and content validity were tested by nurses, researchers and patients. The questionnaire showed good construct validity in all three sets and had strong factor loadings (explained variance >70%, factor loadings >0.5) for all three sets. There was good concurrent validity compared with the SF 12 (r(s)>0.5). Internal consistency was shown to be reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.70-0.85). Stability reliability on retesting was good for the physical and psychosocial sets (r(s)>0.5). CONCLUSION: The 3-set 4P questionnaire was a first step in developing an instrument for assessment of former ICU patients' problems over time. The sample size was small and thus, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1223331
- author
- Akerman, Eva ; Fridlund, Bengt LU ; Ersson, Anders LU and Granberg Axèll, Anetth LU
- publishing date
- 2008
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
- volume
- Aug 7
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:18692395
- scopus:61549120796
- ISSN
- 1532-4036
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.iccn.2008.06.004
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- additional info
- The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Division of Nursing (Closed 2012) (013065000), Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (Mö) (013241110)
- id
- b7dc56e2-f3bd-4dba-a15e-3ccd0553ce4f (old id 1223331)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18692395?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 08:49:57
- date last changed
- 2024-01-12 06:29:52
@article{b7dc56e2-f3bd-4dba-a15e-3ccd0553ce4f, abstract = {{BACKGROUND: Current studies reveal a lack of consensus for the evaluation of physical and psychosocial problems after ICU stay and their changes over time. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for assessing physical and psychosocial problems over time for patients following ICU recovery. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine patients completed the questionnaire, 17 were retested. METHODS AND RESULTS: The questionnaire was constructed in three sets: physical problems, psychosocial problems and follow-up care. Face and content validity were tested by nurses, researchers and patients. The questionnaire showed good construct validity in all three sets and had strong factor loadings (explained variance >70%, factor loadings >0.5) for all three sets. There was good concurrent validity compared with the SF 12 (r(s)>0.5). Internal consistency was shown to be reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.70-0.85). Stability reliability on retesting was good for the physical and psychosocial sets (r(s)>0.5). CONCLUSION: The 3-set 4P questionnaire was a first step in developing an instrument for assessment of former ICU patients' problems over time. The sample size was small and thus, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.}}, author = {{Akerman, Eva and Fridlund, Bengt and Ersson, Anders and Granberg Axèll, Anetth}}, issn = {{1532-4036}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Intensive and Critical Care Nursing}}, title = {{Development of the 3-SET 4P questionnaire for evaluating former ICU patients' physical and psychosocial problems over time: A pilot study.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2008.06.004}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.iccn.2008.06.004}}, volume = {{Aug 7}}, year = {{2008}}, }