Machines as manifestations of global systems : Implications for a sociometabolic ontology of technology
(2021) In Anthropological Theory 21(2). p.206-227- Abstract
- Anthropologists have generally found it reasonable to understand the Industrial Revolution in Britain as a product of global historical processes including colonialism and the structure of world trade. The extent to which the industrialization of British textile production was contingent on global processes has been illuminated in detail by historians such as Joseph Inikori. Andre Gunder Frank proposed that we should reconceptualize technological development as a ‘world economic process, which took place in and because of the structure of the world economy’. Yet the theoretical implications of understanding industrial technological systems as global and unevenly distributed phenomena have, by and large, not contaminated mainstream... (More)
- Anthropologists have generally found it reasonable to understand the Industrial Revolution in Britain as a product of global historical processes including colonialism and the structure of world trade. The extent to which the industrialization of British textile production was contingent on global processes has been illuminated in detail by historians such as Joseph Inikori. Andre Gunder Frank proposed that we should reconceptualize technological development as a ‘world economic process, which took place in and because of the structure of the world economy’. Yet the theoretical implications of understanding industrial technological systems as global and unevenly distributed phenomena have, by and large, not contaminated mainstream conceptions of technologies as politically neutral and fundamentally innocent manifestations of enlightenment, detachable from the societal contexts in which they have emerged. Social theory nevertheless offers perspectives for a radical rethinking of this conventional ontology of modern technology. If the premises of actor–network theory, material culture studies, Marxism and poststructuralist critiques of power and inequalities are combined with the perspectives of ecological economics on global social metabolism, the fossil-fuelled textile factories of 19th-century Britain can be reinterpreted as social instruments for appropriating embodied human labour and natural space from elsewhere in the global system. A renewed ‘anthropology of technology’ might focus on the observation that technology is not simply a matter of putting nature to work, but a strategy of putting other sectors of global society to work (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/ba9b0fa2-838c-4101-9962-4a7df651bd33
- author
- Hornborg, Alf LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021-06-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- technology, sociotechnical system, world-system, unequal exchange, social metabolism
- in
- Anthropological Theory
- volume
- 21
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 22 pages
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85095741810
- ISSN
- 1741-2641
- DOI
- 10.1177/1463499620959247
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- ba9b0fa2-838c-4101-9962-4a7df651bd33
- date added to LUP
- 2017-03-29 17:20:11
- date last changed
- 2022-04-24 22:37:42
@article{ba9b0fa2-838c-4101-9962-4a7df651bd33, abstract = {{Anthropologists have generally found it reasonable to understand the Industrial Revolution in Britain as a product of global historical processes including colonialism and the structure of world trade. The extent to which the industrialization of British textile production was contingent on global processes has been illuminated in detail by historians such as Joseph Inikori. Andre Gunder Frank proposed that we should reconceptualize technological development as a ‘world economic process, which took place in and because of the structure of the world economy’. Yet the theoretical implications of understanding industrial technological systems as global and unevenly distributed phenomena have, by and large, not contaminated mainstream conceptions of technologies as politically neutral and fundamentally innocent manifestations of enlightenment, detachable from the societal contexts in which they have emerged. Social theory nevertheless offers perspectives for a radical rethinking of this conventional ontology of modern technology. If the premises of actor–network theory, material culture studies, Marxism and poststructuralist critiques of power and inequalities are combined with the perspectives of ecological economics on global social metabolism, the fossil-fuelled textile factories of 19th-century Britain can be reinterpreted as social instruments for appropriating embodied human labour and natural space from elsewhere in the global system. A renewed ‘anthropology of technology’ might focus on the observation that technology is not simply a matter of putting nature to work, but a strategy of putting other sectors of global society to work}}, author = {{Hornborg, Alf}}, issn = {{1741-2641}}, keywords = {{technology; sociotechnical system; world-system; unequal exchange; social metabolism}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{06}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{206--227}}, publisher = {{SAGE Publications}}, series = {{Anthropological Theory}}, title = {{Machines as manifestations of global systems : Implications for a sociometabolic ontology of technology}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1463499620959247}}, doi = {{10.1177/1463499620959247}}, volume = {{21}}, year = {{2021}}, }