Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Towards innovation capability in retail services : managing the tensions of exploration and exploitation

Paredes, Karla Marie B. LU orcid and Olander Roese, Malin LU (2024) In International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 34(5). p.551-570
Abstract

Retailing is said to be at a critical period where much higher demands are being placed on retail actors to develop their capability for explorative innovation for lasting competitive advantage. Developing innovation capabilities is a challenging pursuit, however, and is a topic that is under-researched in the retail context. This paper thus investigates tensions that emerge when retail firms pursue explorative innovation in an organisational context characterised by exploitation-oriented activity, and how these are managed through various organisational mechanisms. The findings from our multiple case study reveal how developing innovation capability in incumbent retail firms gives rise to complex tensions related to strategic intent,... (More)

Retailing is said to be at a critical period where much higher demands are being placed on retail actors to develop their capability for explorative innovation for lasting competitive advantage. Developing innovation capabilities is a challenging pursuit, however, and is a topic that is under-researched in the retail context. This paper thus investigates tensions that emerge when retail firms pursue explorative innovation in an organisational context characterised by exploitation-oriented activity, and how these are managed through various organisational mechanisms. The findings from our multiple case study reveal how developing innovation capability in incumbent retail firms gives rise to complex tensions related to strategic intent, organisational culture and structure. These are perceived as organisational paradoxes and managed as such due to the need to balance these opposing poles, emphasising the need for balance instead of making an explicit choice. Retail incumbents establish differentiating mechanisms for innovation, complemented by various integrative mechanisms. The study shows that in order to enable explorative, radical innovation in retail firms, innovation work needs to be differentiated from that of ongoing operations, provided that integration is facilitated at operational and strategic levels. By focusing on incumbent retail firms using exploration-exploitation paradox as a theoretical lens, the study contributes with new perspectives on building innovation capability in this context. The paper gives evidence to how developing innovation capabilities lies in the management of these complex tensions as paradoxes using the combination of differentiation and integration mechanisms.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
ambidexterity, innovation management, paradox, Retail, retail innovation
in
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
volume
34
issue
5
pages
551 - 570
publisher
Taylor & Francis
external identifiers
  • scopus:85184211700
ISSN
0959-3969
DOI
10.1080/09593969.2024.2312892
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ba9d1f21-a63c-4750-aab1-57e6d405e1e3
date added to LUP
2024-03-08 14:14:06
date last changed
2024-12-17 16:04:48
@article{ba9d1f21-a63c-4750-aab1-57e6d405e1e3,
  abstract     = {{<p>Retailing is said to be at a critical period where much higher demands are being placed on retail actors to develop their capability for explorative innovation for lasting competitive advantage. Developing innovation capabilities is a challenging pursuit, however, and is a topic that is under-researched in the retail context. This paper thus investigates tensions that emerge when retail firms pursue explorative innovation in an organisational context characterised by exploitation-oriented activity, and how these are managed through various organisational mechanisms. The findings from our multiple case study reveal how developing innovation capability in incumbent retail firms gives rise to complex tensions related to strategic intent, organisational culture and structure. These are perceived as organisational paradoxes and managed as such due to the need to balance these opposing poles, emphasising the need for balance instead of making an explicit choice. Retail incumbents establish differentiating mechanisms for innovation, complemented by various integrative mechanisms. The study shows that in order to enable explorative, radical innovation in retail firms, innovation work needs to be differentiated from that of ongoing operations, provided that integration is facilitated at operational and strategic levels. By focusing on incumbent retail firms using exploration-exploitation paradox as a theoretical lens, the study contributes with new perspectives on building innovation capability in this context. The paper gives evidence to how developing innovation capabilities lies in the management of these complex tensions as paradoxes using the combination of differentiation and integration mechanisms.</p>}},
  author       = {{Paredes, Karla Marie B. and Olander Roese, Malin}},
  issn         = {{0959-3969}},
  keywords     = {{ambidexterity; innovation management; paradox; Retail; retail innovation}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{551--570}},
  publisher    = {{Taylor & Francis}},
  series       = {{International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research}},
  title        = {{Towards innovation capability in retail services : managing the tensions of exploration and exploitation}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2024.2312892}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09593969.2024.2312892}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}