A registry-based observational study comparing emergency calls assessed by emergency medical dispatchers with and without support by registered nurses
(2022) In Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 30(1).- Abstract
Background: The requirement concerning formal education for emergency medical dispatcher (EMD) is debated and varies, both nationally and internationally. There are few studies on the outcomes of emergency medical dispatching in relation to professional background. This study aimed to compare calls handled by an EMD with and without support by a registered nurse (RN), with respect to priority level, accuracy, and medical condition. Methods: A retrospective observational study, performed on registry data from specific regions during 2015. The ambulance personnel’s first assessment of the priority level and medical condition was used as the reference standard. Outcomes were: the proportion of calls dispatched with a priority in... (More)
Background: The requirement concerning formal education for emergency medical dispatcher (EMD) is debated and varies, both nationally and internationally. There are few studies on the outcomes of emergency medical dispatching in relation to professional background. This study aimed to compare calls handled by an EMD with and without support by a registered nurse (RN), with respect to priority level, accuracy, and medical condition. Methods: A retrospective observational study, performed on registry data from specific regions during 2015. The ambulance personnel’s first assessment of the priority level and medical condition was used as the reference standard. Outcomes were: the proportion of calls dispatched with a priority in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment; over- and undertriage; the proportion of most adverse over- and undertriage; sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for each of the ambulance priorities; proportion of calls dispatched with a medical condition in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment. Proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals. χ2-test was used for comparisons. P-levels < 0.05 were regarded as significant. Results: A total of 25,025 calls were included (EMD n = 23,723, EMD + RN n = 1302). Analyses relating to priority and medical condition were performed on 23,503 and 21,881 calls, respectively. A dispatched priority in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment were: EMD n = 11,319 (50.7%) and EMD + RN n = 481 (41.5%) (p < 0.01). The proportion of overtriage was equal for both groups: EMD n = 5904, EMD + RN n = 306, (26.4%) p = 0.25). The proportion of undertriage for each group was: EMD n = 5122 (22.9%) and EMD + RN n = 371 (32.0%) (p < 0.01). Sensitivity for the most urgent priority was 54.6% for EMD, compared to 29.6% for EMD + RN (p < 0.01), and specificity was 67.3% and 84.8% (p < 0.01) respectively. A dispatched medical condition in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment were: EMD n = 13,785 (66.4%) and EMD + RN n = 697 (62.2%) (p = 0.01). Conclusions: A higher precision of emergency medical dispatching was not observed when the EMD was supported by an RN. How patient safety is affected by the observed divergence in dispatched priorities is an area for future research.
(Less)
- author
- Torlén Wennlund, Klara ; Kurland, Lisa ; Olanders, Knut LU ; Castrén, Maaret and Bohm, Katarina
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Emergency Medical Communication Center, Emergency medical dispatch, Emergency medical dispatcher, Emergency medical services, Pre-hospital triage, Registered nurse
- in
- Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
- volume
- 30
- issue
- 1
- article number
- 1
- publisher
- BioMed Central (BMC)
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:35012595
- scopus:85122755121
- ISSN
- 1757-7241
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13049-021-00987-y
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- bddf1894-bce8-47f9-944e-dd35d7387f58
- date added to LUP
- 2022-03-01 11:07:23
- date last changed
- 2024-04-18 06:04:29
@article{bddf1894-bce8-47f9-944e-dd35d7387f58,
abstract = {{<p>Background: The requirement concerning formal education for emergency medical dispatcher (EMD) is debated and varies, both nationally and internationally. There are few studies on the outcomes of emergency medical dispatching in relation to professional background. This study aimed to compare calls handled by an EMD with and without support by a registered nurse (RN), with respect to priority level, accuracy, and medical condition. Methods: A retrospective observational study, performed on registry data from specific regions during 2015. The ambulance personnel’s first assessment of the priority level and medical condition was used as the reference standard. Outcomes were: the proportion of calls dispatched with a priority in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment; over- and undertriage; the proportion of most adverse over- and undertriage; sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for each of the ambulance priorities; proportion of calls dispatched with a medical condition in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment. Proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals. χ<sup>2</sup>-test was used for comparisons. P-levels < 0.05 were regarded as significant. Results: A total of 25,025 calls were included (EMD n = 23,723, EMD + RN n = 1302). Analyses relating to priority and medical condition were performed on 23,503 and 21,881 calls, respectively. A dispatched priority in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment were: EMD n = 11,319 (50.7%) and EMD + RN n = 481 (41.5%) (p < 0.01). The proportion of overtriage was equal for both groups: EMD n = 5904, EMD + RN n = 306, (26.4%) p = 0.25). The proportion of undertriage for each group was: EMD n = 5122 (22.9%) and EMD + RN n = 371 (32.0%) (p < 0.01). Sensitivity for the most urgent priority was 54.6% for EMD, compared to 29.6% for EMD + RN (p < 0.01), and specificity was 67.3% and 84.8% (p < 0.01) respectively. A dispatched medical condition in concordance with the ambulance personnel’s assessment were: EMD n = 13,785 (66.4%) and EMD + RN n = 697 (62.2%) (p = 0.01). Conclusions: A higher precision of emergency medical dispatching was not observed when the EMD was supported by an RN. How patient safety is affected by the observed divergence in dispatched priorities is an area for future research.</p>}},
author = {{Torlén Wennlund, Klara and Kurland, Lisa and Olanders, Knut and Castrén, Maaret and Bohm, Katarina}},
issn = {{1757-7241}},
keywords = {{Emergency Medical Communication Center; Emergency medical dispatch; Emergency medical dispatcher; Emergency medical services; Pre-hospital triage; Registered nurse}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
publisher = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}},
series = {{Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine}},
title = {{A registry-based observational study comparing emergency calls assessed by emergency medical dispatchers with and without support by registered nurses}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00987-y}},
doi = {{10.1186/s13049-021-00987-y}},
volume = {{30}},
year = {{2022}},
}