Advanced

The mediatization of diplomacy

Pamment, James LU (2014) In The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 9(3). p.253-280
Abstract

Practitioners and scholars are increasingly aware that an array of new actors, communication technologies, agendas and expectations are changing the institution of diplomacy. How diplomatic actors are known and experienced through their representation assumes an increasingly important, and uncertain, role. This article argues that these changes to the field should be considered in terms of the shifting ontological and epistemological conditions for representing and experiencing diplomatic identities. In support of this, the article investigates the influence of mediated communication upon the production of knowledge and the ability to experience others through use of the term 'mediatization'. Mediatization refers to the ways in which... (More)

Practitioners and scholars are increasingly aware that an array of new actors, communication technologies, agendas and expectations are changing the institution of diplomacy. How diplomatic actors are known and experienced through their representation assumes an increasingly important, and uncertain, role. This article argues that these changes to the field should be considered in terms of the shifting ontological and epistemological conditions for representing and experiencing diplomatic identities. In support of this, the article investigates the influence of mediated communication upon the production of knowledge and the ability to experience others through use of the term 'mediatization'. Mediatization refers to the ways in which communication technologies have become so integrated into everyday activities that our knowledge and experience of the world is significantly altered, often in ways that appear banal and taken for granted. In the diplomatic context, mediatization involves placing pressure on actors to negotiate issues and identity salience in new ways; to coordinate and negotiate over codes and norms for representation within different mediated environments; and to strategically manage identities, messages and representational modalities within objective-led campaigns. This analysis is used to question further the relationship linking communication, diplomacy and public diplomacy, with the conclusion that public diplomacy can no longer be considered as entirely external communicative activities attached to the diplomatic world, since these are - in an age of mediatization - necessarily part of diplomacy proper. Rather, public diplomacy makes most sense in that coordinating role, as a form of semiotic and normative coalition-building within organizations and among connected stakeholders.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
agenda-building, diplomacy, mediation, mediatization, public diplomacy, public sphere, socialization
in
The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
volume
9
issue
3
pages
28 pages
publisher
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
external identifiers
  • scopus:84899994113
ISSN
1871-1901
DOI
10.1163/1871191X-12341279
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
c408c92a-889d-4410-866c-f886451e15c4
date added to LUP
2016-05-03 11:04:03
date last changed
2017-07-23 05:13:41
@article{c408c92a-889d-4410-866c-f886451e15c4,
  abstract     = {<p>Practitioners and scholars are increasingly aware that an array of new actors, communication technologies, agendas and expectations are changing the institution of diplomacy. How diplomatic actors are known and experienced through their representation assumes an increasingly important, and uncertain, role. This article argues that these changes to the field should be considered in terms of the shifting ontological and epistemological conditions for representing and experiencing diplomatic identities. In support of this, the article investigates the influence of mediated communication upon the production of knowledge and the ability to experience others through use of the term 'mediatization'. Mediatization refers to the ways in which communication technologies have become so integrated into everyday activities that our knowledge and experience of the world is significantly altered, often in ways that appear banal and taken for granted. In the diplomatic context, mediatization involves placing pressure on actors to negotiate issues and identity salience in new ways; to coordinate and negotiate over codes and norms for representation within different mediated environments; and to strategically manage identities, messages and representational modalities within objective-led campaigns. This analysis is used to question further the relationship linking communication, diplomacy and public diplomacy, with the conclusion that public diplomacy can no longer be considered as entirely external communicative activities attached to the diplomatic world, since these are - in an age of mediatization - necessarily part of diplomacy proper. Rather, public diplomacy makes most sense in that coordinating role, as a form of semiotic and normative coalition-building within organizations and among connected stakeholders.</p>},
  author       = {Pamment, James},
  issn         = {1871-1901},
  keyword      = {agenda-building,diplomacy,mediation,mediatization,public diplomacy,public sphere,socialization},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {08},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {253--280},
  publisher    = {Martinus Nijhoff Publishers},
  series       = {The Hague Journal of Diplomacy},
  title        = {The mediatization of diplomacy},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341279},
  volume       = {9},
  year         = {2014},
}