Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A registry-based study on universal screening for defective mismatch repair in colorectal cancer in Denmark highlights disparities in screening uptake and counselling referrals

Durhuus, Jon Ambæk ; Galanakis, Michael ; Maltesen, Thomas ; Therkildsen, Christina LU ; Rosthøj, Susanne ; Klarskov, Louise Laurberg ; Lautrup, Charlotte Kvist ; Andersen, Ove and Nilbert, Mef Christina LU (2024) In Translational Oncology 46.
Abstract

Universal screening for defective mismatch repair (dMMR) in colorectal cancer utilizes immunohistochemical staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PSM2. Additionally, BRAF V600E mutations status and MLH1 hypermethylation should be performed to distinguish germline and somatic dMMR alterations. A decade of Danish population-based registries has been analysed regarding screening uptake, detection rate and referral to genetic counselling. MMR testing was performed in 71·8% (N = 34,664) of newly diagnosed colorectal cancers with an increasing trend to 88·8% coverage in the study's final year. The likelihood of undergoing MMR testing was reduced in males with 2% (95% CI 0·4–2·7, p = 0·008), with 4·1% in patients above age 70 years (95% CI 1·5–6·6,... (More)

Universal screening for defective mismatch repair (dMMR) in colorectal cancer utilizes immunohistochemical staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PSM2. Additionally, BRAF V600E mutations status and MLH1 hypermethylation should be performed to distinguish germline and somatic dMMR alterations. A decade of Danish population-based registries has been analysed regarding screening uptake, detection rate and referral to genetic counselling. MMR testing was performed in 71·8% (N = 34,664) of newly diagnosed colorectal cancers with an increasing trend to 88·8% coverage in the study's final year. The likelihood of undergoing MMR testing was reduced in males with 2% (95% CI 0·4–2·7, p = 0·008), with 4·1% in patients above age 70 years (95% CI 1·5–6·6, p = 0·003) compared in patients below age 51 years, with 16·3% in rectal cancers (95% CI 15·1–17·6, p < 0·001) and 1·4% left-sided colon cancers (95% CI 0·1–1·7, p = 0·03) compared to right-sided colon cancers. Tumour stage II and III increased the likelihood of being tested, with 3·7% for stage II (95% CI 2·2–5·6, p < 0·001) and 3·3% for stage III tumours (95% CI 1·8–4·8, p < 0·001) compared to stage I tumours, whereas the likelihood for stage IV tumours is reduced by 35·7% (95% CI 34·2–37·2, p < 0·001). Test rates significantly differed between the Danish health care regions. dMMR was identified in 15·1% (95% CI 14·8–15·6, p < 0·001) cases with somatic MMR inactivation in 6·7% of the cases. 8·3% tumours showed hereditary dMMR expression patterns, and 20·0% of those were referred to genetic counselling. Despite the high uptake rates, we found disparities between patient groups and missed opportunities for genetic diagnostics.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Colorectal cancer, DNA mismatch repair, Immunohistochemistry, Lynch syndrome, Reflex testing
in
Translational Oncology
volume
46
article number
102013
publisher
Neoplasia Press
external identifiers
  • pmid:38824875
  • scopus:85194922496
ISSN
1936-5233
DOI
10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102013
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2024
id
c43f9f1e-ee4d-4911-a60b-52c971ee9fb4
date added to LUP
2024-10-25 08:19:23
date last changed
2024-11-08 10:43:50
@article{c43f9f1e-ee4d-4911-a60b-52c971ee9fb4,
  abstract     = {{<p>Universal screening for defective mismatch repair (dMMR) in colorectal cancer utilizes immunohistochemical staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PSM2. Additionally, BRAF V600E mutations status and MLH1 hypermethylation should be performed to distinguish germline and somatic dMMR alterations. A decade of Danish population-based registries has been analysed regarding screening uptake, detection rate and referral to genetic counselling. MMR testing was performed in 71·8% (N = 34,664) of newly diagnosed colorectal cancers with an increasing trend to 88·8% coverage in the study's final year. The likelihood of undergoing MMR testing was reduced in males with 2% (95% CI 0·4–2·7, p = 0·008), with 4·1% in patients above age 70 years (95% CI 1·5–6·6, p = 0·003) compared in patients below age 51 years, with 16·3% in rectal cancers (95% CI 15·1–17·6, p &lt; 0·001) and 1·4% left-sided colon cancers (95% CI 0·1–1·7, p = 0·03) compared to right-sided colon cancers. Tumour stage II and III increased the likelihood of being tested, with 3·7% for stage II (95% CI 2·2–5·6, p &lt; 0·001) and 3·3% for stage III tumours (95% CI 1·8–4·8, p &lt; 0·001) compared to stage I tumours, whereas the likelihood for stage IV tumours is reduced by 35·7% (95% CI 34·2–37·2, p &lt; 0·001). Test rates significantly differed between the Danish health care regions. dMMR was identified in 15·1% (95% CI 14·8–15·6, p &lt; 0·001) cases with somatic MMR inactivation in 6·7% of the cases. 8·3% tumours showed hereditary dMMR expression patterns, and 20·0% of those were referred to genetic counselling. Despite the high uptake rates, we found disparities between patient groups and missed opportunities for genetic diagnostics.</p>}},
  author       = {{Durhuus, Jon Ambæk and Galanakis, Michael and Maltesen, Thomas and Therkildsen, Christina and Rosthøj, Susanne and Klarskov, Louise Laurberg and Lautrup, Charlotte Kvist and Andersen, Ove and Nilbert, Mef Christina}},
  issn         = {{1936-5233}},
  keywords     = {{Colorectal cancer; DNA mismatch repair; Immunohistochemistry; Lynch syndrome; Reflex testing}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Neoplasia Press}},
  series       = {{Translational Oncology}},
  title        = {{A registry-based study on universal screening for defective mismatch repair in colorectal cancer in Denmark highlights disparities in screening uptake and counselling referrals}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102013}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102013}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}