Mayr Versus Woese : Akaryotes and Eukaryotes
(2018) In Grand Challenges in Biology and Biotechnology p.13-54- Abstract
In 1998, on the brink of a great public effort that by now has delivered the sequences of thousands of genomes and has annotated these genomes by translating tens of thousands of 3D protein domain structures from their coding sequences, Ernst Mayr and Carl Woese engaged in a debate. At issue were the virtues of phenotypic contra genotypic approaches to phylogeny and taxonomy. Though not conclusive, this confrontation in retrospect illustrates the defects of both their perspectives and simultaneously illuminates the strengths of the approach to phylogenetic systematics that was favored by Willi Hennig. Hennig’s cladism lends itself well to a rigorous exploitation of genome sequence data in which both the genotypic and phenotypic modes... (More)
In 1998, on the brink of a great public effort that by now has delivered the sequences of thousands of genomes and has annotated these genomes by translating tens of thousands of 3D protein domain structures from their coding sequences, Ernst Mayr and Carl Woese engaged in a debate. At issue were the virtues of phenotypic contra genotypic approaches to phylogeny and taxonomy. Though not conclusive, this confrontation in retrospect illustrates the defects of both their perspectives and simultaneously illuminates the strengths of the approach to phylogenetic systematics that was favored by Willi Hennig. Hennig’s cladism lends itself well to a rigorous exploitation of genome sequence data in which both the genotypic and phenotypic modes replace the technically questionable gene tree approach to deep phylogeny championed by Woese. Diverse phylogenomic data now suggest that though Mayr’s phenetic arguments were incomplete, his division of organisms into two major taxonomic groups, the akaryotes (formerly the prokaryotes) and eukaryotes, is probably correct. Thus, in a phylogeny based on genome repertoires of protein domains, the universal common ancestor of the three superkingdoms descends in two primary lineages, Akaryote and Eukaryote.
(Less)
- author
- Kurland, Charles G. LU and Harish, Ajith LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Akaryocytes, Forterre, Progenote, Superkingdoms, Zuckerkandl
- host publication
- Molecular Mechanisms of Microbial Evolution
- series title
- Grand Challenges in Biology and Biotechnology
- pages
- 42 pages
- publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85101410539
- ISSN
- 2367-1025
- 2367-1017
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-69078-0_2
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c44d37df-c95e-4989-98e4-933c60b29596
- date added to LUP
- 2021-03-11 12:38:20
- date last changed
- 2024-05-04 04:45:01
@inbook{c44d37df-c95e-4989-98e4-933c60b29596,
abstract = {{<p>In 1998, on the brink of a great public effort that by now has delivered the sequences of thousands of genomes and has annotated these genomes by translating tens of thousands of 3D protein domain structures from their coding sequences, Ernst Mayr and Carl Woese engaged in a debate. At issue were the virtues of phenotypic contra genotypic approaches to phylogeny and taxonomy. Though not conclusive, this confrontation in retrospect illustrates the defects of both their perspectives and simultaneously illuminates the strengths of the approach to phylogenetic systematics that was favored by Willi Hennig. Hennig’s cladism lends itself well to a rigorous exploitation of genome sequence data in which both the genotypic and phenotypic modes replace the technically questionable gene tree approach to deep phylogeny championed by Woese. Diverse phylogenomic data now suggest that though Mayr’s phenetic arguments were incomplete, his division of organisms into two major taxonomic groups, the akaryotes (formerly the prokaryotes) and eukaryotes, is probably correct. Thus, in a phylogeny based on genome repertoires of protein domains, the universal common ancestor of the three superkingdoms descends in two primary lineages, Akaryote and Eukaryote.</p>}},
author = {{Kurland, Charles G. and Harish, Ajith}},
booktitle = {{Molecular Mechanisms of Microbial Evolution}},
issn = {{2367-1025}},
keywords = {{Akaryocytes; Forterre; Progenote; Superkingdoms; Zuckerkandl}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{13--54}},
publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media B.V.}},
series = {{Grand Challenges in Biology and Biotechnology}},
title = {{Mayr Versus Woese : Akaryotes and Eukaryotes}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69078-0_2}},
doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-69078-0_2}},
year = {{2018}},
}