Advanced

The Relativity of Poverty and Income : How Reliable Are African Economic Statistics?

Jerven, Morten LU (2010) In African Affairs 109(434). p.77-96
Abstract
It has been argued that the fundamental cause of Africa’s current relative poverty is a lack of pro-growth institutions deriving either from the colonial system, the period of slavery, or from particular geographic or population characteristics. This article takes a fresh look at estimates of African country incomes. It subjects the available datasets to tests of accuracy, reliability, and volatility, and finds that there is very little to explain in terms of diversity of income between countries. With the exception of some resource-rich enclaves, a few island states, and South Africa, the income of one African economy is not meaningfully different from another. It is found that the majority of African countries should for all practical... (More)
It has been argued that the fundamental cause of Africa’s current relative poverty is a lack of pro-growth institutions deriving either from the colonial system, the period of slavery, or from particular geographic or population characteristics. This article takes a fresh look at estimates of African country incomes. It subjects the available datasets to tests of accuracy, reliability, and volatility, and finds that there is very little to explain in terms of diversity of income between countries. With the exception of some resource-rich enclaves, a few island states, and South Africa, the income of one African economy is not meaningfully different from another. It is found that the majority of African countries should for all practical purposes be considered to have the same income level. The article therefore concludes that it is futile to use GDP estimates to prove a link between income today and existence of pro-growth institutions in the past, and recommends a searching reconsideration of the almost exclusive use of GDP as a measure of relative development. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
African Affairs
volume
109
issue
434
pages
20 pages
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:77949299139
ISSN
0001-9909
DOI
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
c50f88f1-fd91-46ce-9f19-e08ab5282437
date added to LUP
2017-06-16 04:20:48
date last changed
2018-06-10 05:19:54
@article{c50f88f1-fd91-46ce-9f19-e08ab5282437,
  abstract     = {It has been argued that the fundamental cause of Africa’s current relative poverty is a lack of pro-growth institutions deriving either from the colonial system, the period of slavery, or from particular geographic or population characteristics. This article takes a fresh look at estimates of African country incomes. It subjects the available datasets to tests of accuracy, reliability, and volatility, and finds that there is very little to explain in terms of diversity of income between countries. With the exception of some resource-rich enclaves, a few island states, and South Africa, the income of one African economy is not meaningfully different from another. It is found that the majority of African countries should for all practical purposes be considered to have the same income level. The article therefore concludes that it is futile to use GDP estimates to prove a link between income today and existence of pro-growth institutions in the past, and recommends a searching reconsideration of the almost exclusive use of GDP as a measure of relative development.},
  author       = {Jerven, Morten},
  issn         = {0001-9909},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {434},
  pages        = {77--96},
  publisher    = {Oxford University Press},
  series       = {African Affairs},
  title        = {The Relativity of Poverty and Income : How Reliable Are African Economic Statistics?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/},
  volume       = {109},
  year         = {2010},
}