Advanced

Governance and Politics in the Upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa

Meissner, Richard and Ramasar, Vasna LU (2015) In Geo Journal 80(5). p.689-689
Abstract
Everyday international political economy (EIPE) offers an opportunity to rethink the role of individuals and citizenry in shaping governance of natural resources. In South Africa, significant progress has been made by government in re-shaping water governance since the end of apartheid in the early 1990s. The role of government in water governance and water politics has thus been emphasised to a large degree. This study looks at historical material to assess the role that water politics and EIPE has played in shaping the use and management of water resources in the country. Case studies are analysed of two quaternary catchments, A63E and A71L in the Limpopo River Basin, to show how everyday actions by different actors has shaped the... (More)
Everyday international political economy (EIPE) offers an opportunity to rethink the role of individuals and citizenry in shaping governance of natural resources. In South Africa, significant progress has been made by government in re-shaping water governance since the end of apartheid in the early 1990s. The role of government in water governance and water politics has thus been emphasised to a large degree. This study looks at historical material to assess the role that water politics and EIPE has played in shaping the use and management of water resources in the country. Case studies are analysed of two quaternary catchments, A63E and A71L in the Limpopo River Basin, to show how everyday actions by different actors has shaped the current waterscape in the basin. Four events, namely, the politics of the Middle Iron Age State at Mapungubwe; the development of the Mapungubwe National Park and World Heritage Site; the management of water for the De Beers Venetia Diamond Mine; and the establishment of the Coal of Africa Limited colliery are discussed in terms of the agential power at play during each event. The conclusions of the study are that EIPE and reflexive agential power are important factors in water governance that can sometimes be ignored through neoliberal institutionalism. In the current and future governance of water in South Africa they can offer an alternative view of the role and importance of actors and pathways for development. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Water governance, politics, south Africa
in
Geo Journal
volume
80
issue
5
pages
709 pages
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:84942502350
ISSN
1572-9893
DOI
doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9589-z
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
c8cac6c2-8cad-46c7-a764-c9986f8912bb
date added to LUP
2017-04-30 17:36:58
date last changed
2017-08-24 15:42:28
@article{c8cac6c2-8cad-46c7-a764-c9986f8912bb,
  abstract     = {Everyday international political economy (EIPE) offers an opportunity to rethink the role of individuals and citizenry in shaping governance of natural resources. In South Africa, significant progress has been made by government in re-shaping water governance since the end of apartheid in the early 1990s. The role of government in water governance and water politics has thus been emphasised to a large degree. This study looks at historical material to assess the role that water politics and EIPE has played in shaping the use and management of water resources in the country. Case studies are analysed of two quaternary catchments, A63E and A71L in the Limpopo River Basin, to show how everyday actions by different actors has shaped the current waterscape in the basin. Four events, namely, the politics of the Middle Iron Age State at Mapungubwe; the development of the Mapungubwe National Park and World Heritage Site; the management of water for the De Beers Venetia Diamond Mine; and the establishment of the Coal of Africa Limited colliery are discussed in terms of the agential power at play during each event. The conclusions of the study are that EIPE and reflexive agential power are important factors in water governance that can sometimes be ignored through neoliberal institutionalism. In the current and future governance of water in South Africa they can offer an alternative view of the role and importance of actors and pathways for development.},
  author       = {Meissner, Richard and Ramasar, Vasna},
  issn         = {1572-9893},
  keyword      = {Water governance, politics, south Africa},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {689--689},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  series       = {Geo Journal},
  title        = {Governance and Politics in the Upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9589-z},
  volume       = {80},
  year         = {2015},
}