Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial keratitis at a referral centre in southern Sweden

Österhed, Elin LU orcid ; Oldberg, Karl LU orcid and Gustafsson, Ingemar LU (2025) In Scientific Reports 15(1).
Abstract

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study evaluating the aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility in patients treated for suspected bacterial keratitis at Skåne University Hospital during 2019. Inclusion criteria: eyes with bacterial keratitis. Exclusion criteria: co-infection with other microbes. Primary outcome parameters: predisposing factors, causative pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility. Secondary outcome parameter: antibiotic treatment. A total of 255 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 149 (58%) occurred in contact lens wearers. Corneal cultures, when performed, were positive in 51% of cases. For eyes which had received antibiotic treatment prior to corneal culture (n = 36), the proportion of positive cultures was... (More)

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study evaluating the aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility in patients treated for suspected bacterial keratitis at Skåne University Hospital during 2019. Inclusion criteria: eyes with bacterial keratitis. Exclusion criteria: co-infection with other microbes. Primary outcome parameters: predisposing factors, causative pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility. Secondary outcome parameter: antibiotic treatment. A total of 255 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 149 (58%) occurred in contact lens wearers. Corneal cultures, when performed, were positive in 51% of cases. For eyes which had received antibiotic treatment prior to corneal culture (n = 36), the proportion of positive cultures was 50%. Ulcers < 1 mm were less likely to yield a positive culture than those ≥ 1 mm. The most frequently isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative staphylococci (48%). Antibiotic resistance rates were lowest to levofloxacin (0%), ciprofloxacin (2%) and chloramphenicol (4%), and highest to fusidic acid (47%) and clindamycin (19%). The low proportion of positive cultures from small ulcers suggests that these warrant a different diagnostic approach. Furthermore, corneal cultures from eyes with ongoing antibiotic treatment were positive to the same extent as those from untreated eyes, suggesting that discontinuation of antibiotic treatment before re-culturing might not be necessary.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Antibiotic susceptibility, Bacterial keratitis, Keratitis aetiology, Keratitis treatment, Ophthalmology
in
Scientific Reports
volume
15
issue
1
article number
20123
publisher
Nature Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • scopus:105008715979
  • pmid:40542031
ISSN
2045-2322
DOI
10.1038/s41598-025-04404-7
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
cf6af904-3c4c-48a7-92fa-30529030b3b1
date added to LUP
2025-10-23 11:46:29
date last changed
2025-11-20 13:55:22
@article{cf6af904-3c4c-48a7-92fa-30529030b3b1,
  abstract     = {{<p>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study evaluating the aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility in patients treated for suspected bacterial keratitis at Skåne University Hospital during 2019. Inclusion criteria: eyes with bacterial keratitis. Exclusion criteria: co-infection with other microbes. Primary outcome parameters: predisposing factors, causative pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility. Secondary outcome parameter: antibiotic treatment. A total of 255 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 149 (58%) occurred in contact lens wearers. Corneal cultures, when performed, were positive in 51% of cases. For eyes which had received antibiotic treatment prior to corneal culture (n = 36), the proportion of positive cultures was 50%. Ulcers &lt; 1 mm were less likely to yield a positive culture than those ≥ 1 mm. The most frequently isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative staphylococci (48%). Antibiotic resistance rates were lowest to levofloxacin (0%), ciprofloxacin (2%) and chloramphenicol (4%), and highest to fusidic acid (47%) and clindamycin (19%). The low proportion of positive cultures from small ulcers suggests that these warrant a different diagnostic approach. Furthermore, corneal cultures from eyes with ongoing antibiotic treatment were positive to the same extent as those from untreated eyes, suggesting that discontinuation of antibiotic treatment before re-culturing might not be necessary.</p>}},
  author       = {{Österhed, Elin and Oldberg, Karl and Gustafsson, Ingemar}},
  issn         = {{2045-2322}},
  keywords     = {{Antibiotic susceptibility; Bacterial keratitis; Keratitis aetiology; Keratitis treatment; Ophthalmology}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Nature Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{Scientific Reports}},
  title        = {{Aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial keratitis at a referral centre in southern Sweden}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04404-7}},
  doi          = {{10.1038/s41598-025-04404-7}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}