Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The need for automation is limited when using a quick and inexpensive one-tube DNA extraction protocol for crime scene samples

Forsberg, Christina ; Jansson, Linda LU ; Ansell, Carina and Hedman, Johannes LU (2019) In Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 7(1). p.377-378
Abstract

Generally, simplified manual protocols can serve as a cost-effective alternative to sophisticated automation solutions. We have developed, validated and implemented a quick, inexpensive and efficient one-tube direct lysis DNA extraction protocol for the majority of our crime scene samples. The method includes one pipetting step, the addition of a lysis buffer based on Chelex beads, Proteinase K and Tween 20. After three incubation steps with vortexing in between, the sample is ready for downstream applications (DNA quantification and STR profiling). The amount of lysis buffer added varies between 200–1000 μL depending on the amount of carrier material in the tube. If needed the extract can be purified or concentrated using a filter... (More)

Generally, simplified manual protocols can serve as a cost-effective alternative to sophisticated automation solutions. We have developed, validated and implemented a quick, inexpensive and efficient one-tube direct lysis DNA extraction protocol for the majority of our crime scene samples. The method includes one pipetting step, the addition of a lysis buffer based on Chelex beads, Proteinase K and Tween 20. After three incubation steps with vortexing in between, the sample is ready for downstream applications (DNA quantification and STR profiling). The amount of lysis buffer added varies between 200–1000 μL depending on the amount of carrier material in the tube. If needed the extract can be purified or concentrated using a filter device, in our case Amicon Ultra-2. Through in-house validation we show that the method is fit-for-purpose for application in casework for samples containing blood, saliva, shed cells and semen as it provides high DNA yields and high quality STR profiles. The method was implemented at the Swedish National Forensic Centre (NFC) in February 2018. During the first year more than 35,000 crime scene samples were extracted using the method, generating DNA yields equivalent to the previously used method. In conclusion, the need for automation of the DNA extraction process is limited when using a one-tube direct lysis protocol including only the addition of lysis buffer and no transferring steps. In addition it saves costs as there is no need for expensive pipetting robots or service fees and since the reagents used in this direct lysis protocol are relatively inexpensive.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Automation, DNA extraction
in
Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series
volume
7
issue
1
pages
377 - 378
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85073243397
ISSN
1875-1768
DOI
10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.019
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
cfed6651-b560-4226-8ccd-b29939dd66d6
date added to LUP
2019-10-25 11:45:40
date last changed
2022-04-18 18:45:51
@article{cfed6651-b560-4226-8ccd-b29939dd66d6,
  abstract     = {{<p>Generally, simplified manual protocols can serve as a cost-effective alternative to sophisticated automation solutions. We have developed, validated and implemented a quick, inexpensive and efficient one-tube direct lysis DNA extraction protocol for the majority of our crime scene samples. The method includes one pipetting step, the addition of a lysis buffer based on Chelex beads, Proteinase K and Tween 20. After three incubation steps with vortexing in between, the sample is ready for downstream applications (DNA quantification and STR profiling). The amount of lysis buffer added varies between 200–1000 μL depending on the amount of carrier material in the tube. If needed the extract can be purified or concentrated using a filter device, in our case Amicon Ultra-2. Through in-house validation we show that the method is fit-for-purpose for application in casework for samples containing blood, saliva, shed cells and semen as it provides high DNA yields and high quality STR profiles. The method was implemented at the Swedish National Forensic Centre (NFC) in February 2018. During the first year more than 35,000 crime scene samples were extracted using the method, generating DNA yields equivalent to the previously used method. In conclusion, the need for automation of the DNA extraction process is limited when using a one-tube direct lysis protocol including only the addition of lysis buffer and no transferring steps. In addition it saves costs as there is no need for expensive pipetting robots or service fees and since the reagents used in this direct lysis protocol are relatively inexpensive.</p>}},
  author       = {{Forsberg, Christina and Jansson, Linda and Ansell, Carina and Hedman, Johannes}},
  issn         = {{1875-1768}},
  keywords     = {{Automation; DNA extraction}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{377--378}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series}},
  title        = {{The need for automation is limited when using a quick and inexpensive one-tube DNA extraction protocol for crime scene samples}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.019}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.019}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}