Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Performance indicators for organ donation and transplantation programmes in Europe : modified Delphi consensus study

Streit, Simon ; Wharton, George ; Mah, Jasmine ; Van Kessel, Robin ; Prionas, Apostolos ; Johnston-Webber, Charlotte ; Boletis, John ; Domínguez-Gil, Beatriz ; Forsberg, Anna LU and França, Ana , et al. (2026) In British Journal of Surgery 113(1).
Abstract

Background: Health system performance assessment helps identify areas for improvement and guides policy initiatives. Although well-validated indicators exist for measuring organ donation and transplantation performance at the facility level, consensus on indicators for assessing national programmes is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive scorecard for evaluating national organ donation and transplantation programmes. Methods: A three-step approach was used. First, a targeted literature review identified potential indicators from regulatory documents, national transplant organization reports, and databases. Second, indicators were mapped to an established transplant system framework and refined through... (More)

Background: Health system performance assessment helps identify areas for improvement and guides policy initiatives. Although well-validated indicators exist for measuring organ donation and transplantation performance at the facility level, consensus on indicators for assessing national programmes is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive scorecard for evaluating national organ donation and transplantation programmes. Methods: A three-step approach was used. First, a targeted literature review identified potential indicators from regulatory documents, national transplant organization reports, and databases. Second, indicators were mapped to an established transplant system framework and refined through preliminary expert consultations. Third, a modified Delphi consensus process validated the indicators. The Delphi panel comprised international experts in health policy, organ donation, transplantation, and patient representation. Participants rated 168 indicators using a five-point Likert scale across two rounds (24 experts completed round 1 and 22 experts completed round 2). Consensus for inclusion required 80% agreement. Results: Of 168 indicators evaluated, 103 achieved consensus for inclusion. After consolidation of organ-specific indicators, the final set contained 84 indicators across seven domains: monitoring and reporting (8 indicators), prevention and need (9 indicators), waiting lists (11 indicators), consent (4 indicators), donation (28 indicators), transplantation (14 indicators), and follow-up (10 indicators). The indicator set incorporates established metrics such as waiting list statistics, donation rates, and complication rates alongside novel system-level indicators addressing structural factors, patient-centredness, and equity in care delivery. Conclusion: This validated indicator set provides a standardized tool for assessing and comparing transplant system performance across European countries, supporting performance benchmarking and evidence-informed policy development.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
British Journal of Surgery
volume
113
issue
1
article number
znaf293
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:105028227126
  • pmid:41569582
ISSN
0007-1323
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znaf293
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
d01ec488-455c-4622-a969-f33814656ec2
date added to LUP
2026-02-25 12:06:26
date last changed
2026-02-26 03:00:05
@article{d01ec488-455c-4622-a969-f33814656ec2,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: Health system performance assessment helps identify areas for improvement and guides policy initiatives. Although well-validated indicators exist for measuring organ donation and transplantation performance at the facility level, consensus on indicators for assessing national programmes is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive scorecard for evaluating national organ donation and transplantation programmes. Methods: A three-step approach was used. First, a targeted literature review identified potential indicators from regulatory documents, national transplant organization reports, and databases. Second, indicators were mapped to an established transplant system framework and refined through preliminary expert consultations. Third, a modified Delphi consensus process validated the indicators. The Delphi panel comprised international experts in health policy, organ donation, transplantation, and patient representation. Participants rated 168 indicators using a five-point Likert scale across two rounds (24 experts completed round 1 and 22 experts completed round 2). Consensus for inclusion required 80% agreement. Results: Of 168 indicators evaluated, 103 achieved consensus for inclusion. After consolidation of organ-specific indicators, the final set contained 84 indicators across seven domains: monitoring and reporting (8 indicators), prevention and need (9 indicators), waiting lists (11 indicators), consent (4 indicators), donation (28 indicators), transplantation (14 indicators), and follow-up (10 indicators). The indicator set incorporates established metrics such as waiting list statistics, donation rates, and complication rates alongside novel system-level indicators addressing structural factors, patient-centredness, and equity in care delivery. Conclusion: This validated indicator set provides a standardized tool for assessing and comparing transplant system performance across European countries, supporting performance benchmarking and evidence-informed policy development.</p>}},
  author       = {{Streit, Simon and Wharton, George and Mah, Jasmine and Van Kessel, Robin and Prionas, Apostolos and Johnston-Webber, Charlotte and Boletis, John and Domínguez-Gil, Beatriz and Forsberg, Anna and França, Ana and Gardiner, Dale and Jeurissen, Patrick and Papanicolas, Irene and Pearcey, Oliver and Rasmussen, Allan and Romagnoli, Jacopo and Mossialos, Elias and Papalois, Vassilios}},
  issn         = {{0007-1323}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{British Journal of Surgery}},
  title        = {{Performance indicators for organ donation and transplantation programmes in Europe : modified Delphi consensus study}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf293}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/bjs/znaf293}},
  volume       = {{113}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}