Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A

Armstrong, Elina and Hillarp, Andreas LU (2014) In European Journal of Haematology. Supplementum 93(s76). p.48-50
Abstract

UNLABELLED: There are three main methods used to assay factor VIII (FVIII) activity: the one-stage and two-stage clotting assays and the two-stage chromogenic method. The most commonly used assay for the diagnosis of haemophilia A is the automated one-stage FVIII assay. The classical two-stage FVIII assays are less frequently used. The chromogenic FVIII:C assay is a variant of the two-stage assay. It is easier to use and therefore used more commonly. Recently significant assay discrepancy has been recognised in the FVIII:C measurements in approximately one-third of mild haemophilia A patients. This so-called discrepant mild haemophilia A is characterised by a high ratio of one-stage/two-stage assay with one-stage FVIII levels that are... (More)

UNLABELLED: There are three main methods used to assay factor VIII (FVIII) activity: the one-stage and two-stage clotting assays and the two-stage chromogenic method. The most commonly used assay for the diagnosis of haemophilia A is the automated one-stage FVIII assay. The classical two-stage FVIII assays are less frequently used. The chromogenic FVIII:C assay is a variant of the two-stage assay. It is easier to use and therefore used more commonly. Recently significant assay discrepancy has been recognised in the FVIII:C measurements in approximately one-third of mild haemophilia A patients. This so-called discrepant mild haemophilia A is characterised by a high ratio of one-stage/two-stage assay with one-stage FVIII levels that are typically more than double those of the two-stage coagulation assay. There are several mutations that destabilise the FVIIIa structure that can explain this result of a more pronounced decrease of the chromogenic FVIII:C activity compared with the one-stage activity. These mutations are clustered at the interfaces of the A1, A2 and A3 domains of the FVIII protein. The inverse discrepancy, where the one-stage assay gives lower FVIII:C results than the chromogenic assay, seems to be associated with mutations found close to important sites for thrombin cleavage or FIX binding. We are carrying out a study of mild haemophilia A samples from the Malmö Haemophilia Centre of families with a unique F8 genotype. The activity of FVIII will be measured using a chromogenic assay and two different one-stage assays. We hope to estimate the true size of assay discrepancy.

AIM: This project will review assay discrepancy in mild/moderate haemophilia A and the risk of misdiagnosis. The overall aim is to estimate the size of the problem and to learn from the literature and experiences from our centre as well as to suggest recommendations on how to avoid misdiagnosis.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Blood Coagulation Tests/methods, Hemophilia A/blood, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Severity of Illness Index
in
European Journal of Haematology. Supplementum
volume
93
issue
s76
pages
48 - 50
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:84902995350
  • pmid:24957107
ISSN
0902-4506
DOI
10.1111/ejh.12374
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
id
d215c768-9494-4a31-8ec5-5d50be437fa4
date added to LUP
2022-08-29 10:57:29
date last changed
2024-01-03 18:30:50
@article{d215c768-9494-4a31-8ec5-5d50be437fa4,
  abstract     = {{<p>UNLABELLED: There are three main methods used to assay factor VIII (FVIII) activity: the one-stage and two-stage clotting assays and the two-stage chromogenic method. The most commonly used assay for the diagnosis of haemophilia A is the automated one-stage FVIII assay. The classical two-stage FVIII assays are less frequently used. The chromogenic FVIII:C assay is a variant of the two-stage assay. It is easier to use and therefore used more commonly. Recently significant assay discrepancy has been recognised in the FVIII:C measurements in approximately one-third of mild haemophilia A patients. This so-called discrepant mild haemophilia A is characterised by a high ratio of one-stage/two-stage assay with one-stage FVIII levels that are typically more than double those of the two-stage coagulation assay. There are several mutations that destabilise the FVIIIa structure that can explain this result of a more pronounced decrease of the chromogenic FVIII:C activity compared with the one-stage activity. These mutations are clustered at the interfaces of the A1, A2 and A3 domains of the FVIII protein. The inverse discrepancy, where the one-stage assay gives lower FVIII:C results than the chromogenic assay, seems to be associated with mutations found close to important sites for thrombin cleavage or FIX binding. We are carrying out a study of mild haemophilia A samples from the Malmö Haemophilia Centre of families with a unique F8 genotype. The activity of FVIII will be measured using a chromogenic assay and two different one-stage assays. We hope to estimate the true size of assay discrepancy.</p><p>AIM: This project will review assay discrepancy in mild/moderate haemophilia A and the risk of misdiagnosis. The overall aim is to estimate the size of the problem and to learn from the literature and experiences from our centre as well as to suggest recommendations on how to avoid misdiagnosis.</p>}},
  author       = {{Armstrong, Elina and Hillarp, Andreas}},
  issn         = {{0902-4506}},
  keywords     = {{Blood Coagulation Tests/methods; Hemophilia A/blood; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{s76}},
  pages        = {{48--50}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{European Journal of Haematology. Supplementum}},
  title        = {{Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12374}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/ejh.12374}},
  volume       = {{93}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}