Observing judicial work and emotions : using two researchers
(2016) In Qualitative Research 16(4). p.375-391- Abstract
- Observation is an important component of research to examine complex social settings and iswell-established for studying courtroom dynamics and judicial behaviour. However, the manyactivities occurring at once and the multiple participants, lay and professional, make it impossiblefor a sole researcher to observe and understand everything occurring in the courtroom. Thisarticle reports on the use of two researchers to undertake court observations, in two differentstudies, each nested in a different research design. The social nature of data collection and thevalue of dialogue between the two researchers in interpreting observed events, especially whenstudying emotion, are readily apparent in both studies.
- Abstract (Swedish)
- Observation is an important component of research to examine complex social settings and is well-established for studying courtroom dynamics and judicial behaviour. However, the many activities occurring at once and the multiple participants, lay and professional, make it impossible for a sole researcher to observe and understand everything occurring in the courtroom. This article reports on the use of two researchers to undertake court observations, in two different studies, each nested in a different research design. The social nature of data collection and the
value of dialogue between the two researchers in interpreting observed events, especially when studying emotion, are readily apparent in both studies.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/d578d83b-2e63-4f6b-9747-10fd66783518
- author
- Roach Anleu, Sharyn
; Bergman Blix, Stina
LU
; Mack, Kathy
and Wettergren, Åsa
- publishing date
- 2016-08
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- collaboration, court observations, courts, demeanour, emotions, emotion work, judiciary, observation research, Sociology, Sociologi, collaboration, court observations, courts, demeanour, emotions, emotion work, judiciary, observation research
- in
- Qualitative Research
- volume
- 16
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 17 pages
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84978811067
- ISSN
- 1468-7941
- DOI
- 10.1177/1468794115579475
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- additional info
- 2017-11-13T21:27:38.839+01:00
- id
- d578d83b-2e63-4f6b-9747-10fd66783518
- date added to LUP
- 2026-01-27 13:32:49
- date last changed
- 2026-02-02 10:03:00
@article{d578d83b-2e63-4f6b-9747-10fd66783518,
abstract = {{Observation is an important component of research to examine complex social settings and iswell-established for studying courtroom dynamics and judicial behaviour. However, the manyactivities occurring at once and the multiple participants, lay and professional, make it impossiblefor a sole researcher to observe and understand everything occurring in the courtroom. Thisarticle reports on the use of two researchers to undertake court observations, in two differentstudies, each nested in a different research design. The social nature of data collection and thevalue of dialogue between the two researchers in interpreting observed events, especially whenstudying emotion, are readily apparent in both studies.}},
author = {{Roach Anleu, Sharyn and Bergman Blix, Stina and Mack, Kathy and Wettergren, Åsa}},
issn = {{1468-7941}},
keywords = {{collaboration; court observations; courts; demeanour; emotions; emotion work; judiciary; observation research; Sociology; Sociologi; collaboration, court observations, courts, demeanour, emotions, emotion work, judiciary, observation research}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{375--391}},
publisher = {{SAGE Publications}},
series = {{Qualitative Research}},
title = {{Observing judicial work and emotions : using two researchers}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794115579475}},
doi = {{10.1177/1468794115579475}},
volume = {{16}},
year = {{2016}},
}