Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Long-term risk of reoperation after modular hemiarthroplasty : Any differences between uni- or bipolar design?

Lind, Dennis LU ; Nåtman, Jonatan ; Mohaddes, Maziar LU and Rogmark, Cecilia LU (2023) In BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 24(1).
Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether unipolar (UHA) or bipolar (BHA) hemiarthroplasty should be the preferred treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF). Aim: We investigated the reoperation rate at 13 years post-fracture after BHA and UHA as treatment of FNF, including a subgroup analysis of individuals who survived 5 years or more, and described the reasons for reoperation after BHA and UHA respectively. Methods: In an observational cohort study on prospectively collected national register data, 16,216 BHA and 22,186 UHA were available for matching. A propensity score for treatment with bipolar HA was estimated using logistic regression. Matching was done using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement. Of the 16,216 BHA... (More)

Background: It is unclear whether unipolar (UHA) or bipolar (BHA) hemiarthroplasty should be the preferred treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF). Aim: We investigated the reoperation rate at 13 years post-fracture after BHA and UHA as treatment of FNF, including a subgroup analysis of individuals who survived 5 years or more, and described the reasons for reoperation after BHA and UHA respectively. Methods: In an observational cohort study on prospectively collected national register data, 16,216 BHA and 22,186 UHA were available for matching. A propensity score for treatment with bipolar HA was estimated using logistic regression. Matching was done using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement. Of the 16,216 BHA patients, 12,280 were matched to a UHA control. A subgroup analysis based on the matched sample excluded individuals who died within 5 years and comprised 3,637 individuals with BHA and 3,537 with UHA. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used. Results: In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 92% of the BHA group was free from reoperation at 13 years (95% CI 0.91–0.93), compared to 92% in the UHA group (CI 0.89–0.94). BHA was associated with more reoperations until 3 years. Reoperation due to infection was most common after BHA, n = 212 (1.7%) compared to n = 141 (1.1%) after UHA. Dislocation led to reoperation in 192 of the BHA cases (1.6%) and in 157 of the UHA cases (1.3%). Acetabular erosion/pain occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%. Amongst those surviving ≥ 5 years, 93% of the BHA group was free from reoperation (CI 0.92–0.94) at 13 years, 92% after UHA (CI 0.90–0.94). BHA had more reoperations during the 1st year only. The causes for reoperations showed similar rates except for acetabular erosion/pain. Here the BHA group had 2 cases (0.1%), the UHA had 39 (1.1%). Conclusion: With a modular hemiarthroplasty relatively few patients need a reoperation. During the first years, there is a higher reoperation rate after BHA compared to UHA. Thereafter, no differences are seen. In patients who survive ≥ 5 years after the fracture there are more reoperations due to acetabular erosion after UHA, but crude numbers are extremely low, and the total reoperation rate is not affected.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
keywords
Bipolar, Dislocation, Femoral neck fractures, Hemiarthroplasty, Periprosthetic Infection, Unipolar
in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
volume
24
issue
1
article number
911
publisher
BioMed Central (BMC)
external identifiers
  • pmid:38001417
  • scopus:85177772656
ISSN
1471-2474
DOI
10.1186/s12891-023-07035-z
language
English
LU publication?
no
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
id
d683be75-ffb0-4b26-bfbc-e0f4795e2ac5
date added to LUP
2023-12-20 11:40:54
date last changed
2024-04-18 21:19:19
@article{d683be75-ffb0-4b26-bfbc-e0f4795e2ac5,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: It is unclear whether unipolar (UHA) or bipolar (BHA) hemiarthroplasty should be the preferred treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF). Aim: We investigated the reoperation rate at 13 years post-fracture after BHA and UHA as treatment of FNF, including a subgroup analysis of individuals who survived 5 years or more, and described the reasons for reoperation after BHA and UHA respectively. Methods: In an observational cohort study on prospectively collected national register data, 16,216 BHA and 22,186 UHA were available for matching. A propensity score for treatment with bipolar HA was estimated using logistic regression. Matching was done using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement. Of the 16,216 BHA patients, 12,280 were matched to a UHA control. A subgroup analysis based on the matched sample excluded individuals who died within 5 years and comprised 3,637 individuals with BHA and 3,537 with UHA. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used. Results: In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 92% of the BHA group was free from reoperation at 13 years (95% CI 0.91–0.93), compared to 92% in the UHA group (CI 0.89–0.94). BHA was associated with more reoperations until 3 years. Reoperation due to infection was most common after BHA, n = 212 (1.7%) compared to n = 141 (1.1%) after UHA. Dislocation led to reoperation in 192 of the BHA cases (1.6%) and in 157 of the UHA cases (1.3%). Acetabular erosion/pain occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%. Amongst those surviving ≥ 5 years, 93% of the BHA group was free from reoperation (CI 0.92–0.94) at 13 years, 92% after UHA (CI 0.90–0.94). BHA had more reoperations during the 1st year only. The causes for reoperations showed similar rates except for acetabular erosion/pain. Here the BHA group had 2 cases (0.1%), the UHA had 39 (1.1%). Conclusion: With a modular hemiarthroplasty relatively few patients need a reoperation. During the first years, there is a higher reoperation rate after BHA compared to UHA. Thereafter, no differences are seen. In patients who survive ≥ 5 years after the fracture there are more reoperations due to acetabular erosion after UHA, but crude numbers are extremely low, and the total reoperation rate is not affected.</p>}},
  author       = {{Lind, Dennis and Nåtman, Jonatan and Mohaddes, Maziar and Rogmark, Cecilia}},
  issn         = {{1471-2474}},
  keywords     = {{Bipolar; Dislocation; Femoral neck fractures; Hemiarthroplasty; Periprosthetic Infection; Unipolar}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}},
  series       = {{BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}},
  title        = {{Long-term risk of reoperation after modular hemiarthroplasty : Any differences between uni- or bipolar design?}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07035-z}},
  doi          = {{10.1186/s12891-023-07035-z}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}