Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Underestimated Interannual Variability of Terrestrial Vegetation Production by Terrestrial Ecosystem Models

Lin, Shangrong ; Hu, Zhongmin ; Wang, Yingping ; Chen, Xiuzhi ; He, Bin ; Song, Zhaoliang ; Sun, Shaobo ; Wu, Chaoyang ; Zheng, Yi and Xia, Xiaosheng , et al. (2023) In Global Biogeochemical Cycles 37(4).
Abstract

Vegetation gross primary production (GPP) is the largest terrestrial carbon flux and plays an important role in regulating the carbon sink. Current terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs) are indispensable tools for evaluating and predicting GPP. However, to which degree the TEMs can capture the interannual variability (IAV) of GPP remains unclear. With large data sets of remote sensing, in situ observations, and predictions of TEMs at a global scale, this study found that the current TEMs substantially underestimate the GPP IAV in comparison to observations at global flux towers. Our results also showed the larger underestimations of IAV in GPP at nonforest ecosystem types than forest types, especially in arid and semiarid grassland and... (More)

Vegetation gross primary production (GPP) is the largest terrestrial carbon flux and plays an important role in regulating the carbon sink. Current terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs) are indispensable tools for evaluating and predicting GPP. However, to which degree the TEMs can capture the interannual variability (IAV) of GPP remains unclear. With large data sets of remote sensing, in situ observations, and predictions of TEMs at a global scale, this study found that the current TEMs substantially underestimate the GPP IAV in comparison to observations at global flux towers. Our results also showed the larger underestimations of IAV in GPP at nonforest ecosystem types than forest types, especially in arid and semiarid grassland and shrubland. One cause of the underestimation is that the IAV in GPP predicted by models is strongly dependent on canopy structure, that is, leaf area index (LAI), and the models underestimate the changes of canopy physiology responding to climate change. On the other hand, the simulated interannual variations of LAI are much less than the observed. Our results highlight the importance of improving TEMs by precisely characterizing the contribution of canopy physiological changes on the IAV in GPP and of clarifying the reason for the underestimated IAV in LAI. With these efforts, it may be possible to accurately predict the IAV in GPP and the stability of the global carbon sink in the context of global climate change.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
GPP, interannual variability, LAI, terrestrial ecosystem model
in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
volume
37
issue
4
article number
e2023GB007696
publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
external identifiers
  • scopus:85153849558
ISSN
0886-6236
DOI
10.1029/2023GB007696
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
da472c89-bcb1-4cbe-8bb8-8327ce1fb2b5
date added to LUP
2023-10-09 15:57:40
date last changed
2023-11-21 17:16:04
@article{da472c89-bcb1-4cbe-8bb8-8327ce1fb2b5,
  abstract     = {{<p>Vegetation gross primary production (GPP) is the largest terrestrial carbon flux and plays an important role in regulating the carbon sink. Current terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs) are indispensable tools for evaluating and predicting GPP. However, to which degree the TEMs can capture the interannual variability (IAV) of GPP remains unclear. With large data sets of remote sensing, in situ observations, and predictions of TEMs at a global scale, this study found that the current TEMs substantially underestimate the GPP IAV in comparison to observations at global flux towers. Our results also showed the larger underestimations of IAV in GPP at nonforest ecosystem types than forest types, especially in arid and semiarid grassland and shrubland. One cause of the underestimation is that the IAV in GPP predicted by models is strongly dependent on canopy structure, that is, leaf area index (LAI), and the models underestimate the changes of canopy physiology responding to climate change. On the other hand, the simulated interannual variations of LAI are much less than the observed. Our results highlight the importance of improving TEMs by precisely characterizing the contribution of canopy physiological changes on the IAV in GPP and of clarifying the reason for the underestimated IAV in LAI. With these efforts, it may be possible to accurately predict the IAV in GPP and the stability of the global carbon sink in the context of global climate change.</p>}},
  author       = {{Lin, Shangrong and Hu, Zhongmin and Wang, Yingping and Chen, Xiuzhi and He, Bin and Song, Zhaoliang and Sun, Shaobo and Wu, Chaoyang and Zheng, Yi and Xia, Xiaosheng and Liu, Liyang and Tang, Jing and Sun, Qing and Joos, Fortunat and Yuan, Wenping}},
  issn         = {{0886-6236}},
  keywords     = {{GPP; interannual variability; LAI; terrestrial ecosystem model}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  publisher    = {{American Geophysical Union (AGU)}},
  series       = {{Global Biogeochemical Cycles}},
  title        = {{Underestimated Interannual Variability of Terrestrial Vegetation Production by Terrestrial Ecosystem Models}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007696}},
  doi          = {{10.1029/2023GB007696}},
  volume       = {{37}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}