Between History and Power. The Historiography of Romanian National- Communism (1964–1989)
Zavatti, Francesco LU
(2020)
In Cuadernos de Historia Contemporanea
42.
p.39-58
- Abstract
- This article aims to analyse the relationship between history and political power in communist Romania during the rule of Nicolae Ceauşescu. The article’s opening section explains how Romanian historiography was substituted by a pro-Soviet and pro-Stalinist version which proclaimed the superiority of the Soviet Union and of communism; secondly, the section illustrates the delicate passage between Stalinism and national communism. As the section shows, Party Secretary Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej understood that autonomy from Moscow was essential in order to guarantee the internal stability of the Romanian communist élite. For this reason, genuine legitimacy had to be created by reissuing the national ideology dismissed since 1948. National... (More)
- This article aims to analyse the relationship between history and political power in communist Romania during the rule of Nicolae Ceauşescu. The article’s opening section explains how Romanian historiography was substituted by a pro-Soviet and pro-Stalinist version which proclaimed the superiority of the Soviet Union and of communism; secondly, the section illustrates the delicate passage between Stalinism and national communism. As the section shows, Party Secretary Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej understood that autonomy from Moscow was essential in order to guarantee the internal stability of the Romanian communist élite. For this reason, genuine legitimacy had to be created by reissuing the national ideology dismissed since 1948. National history was given back its primary importance within Romanian culture, this time in service of the Stalinist élite, sided with more traditional Marxist-Leninist tenets, symbols and narratives. The second section illustrates the development of the new national-communist canon after 1965, once Nicolae Ceauşescu took power. The section presents the main trends developed by Romanian historiography in order to inspire loyalty to the Romanian Communist Party. As the article shows, by the early eighties, nationalism and the cult of the leader had become the main trends of this metanarrative. The epilogue briefly points out the continuities and changes produced by the regime change in 1989 for Romanian historiography.Keywords: Historiography; Stalinism; Romania; national communism; politics and history. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/dcc97365-98c3-47f7-a01c-0926bf3dbff7
- author
- Zavatti, Francesco
LU
- publishing date
- 2020
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Romania, historiography, Ceausescu, cult of the leader, nationalism
- in
- Cuadernos de Historia Contemporanea
- volume
- 42
- pages
- 20 pages
- publisher
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- DOI
- 10.5209/chco.71890
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- dcc97365-98c3-47f7-a01c-0926bf3dbff7
- date added to LUP
- 2022-09-04 14:21:52
- date last changed
- 2022-09-12 14:03:54
@article{dcc97365-98c3-47f7-a01c-0926bf3dbff7,
abstract = {{This article aims to analyse the relationship between history and political power in communist Romania during the rule of Nicolae Ceauşescu. The article’s opening section explains how Romanian historiography was substituted by a pro-Soviet and pro-Stalinist version which proclaimed the superiority of the Soviet Union and of communism; secondly, the section illustrates the delicate passage between Stalinism and national communism. As the section shows, Party Secretary Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej understood that autonomy from Moscow was essential in order to guarantee the internal stability of the Romanian communist élite. For this reason, genuine legitimacy had to be created by reissuing the national ideology dismissed since 1948. National history was given back its primary importance within Romanian culture, this time in service of the Stalinist élite, sided with more traditional Marxist-Leninist tenets, symbols and narratives. The second section illustrates the development of the new national-communist canon after 1965, once Nicolae Ceauşescu took power. The section presents the main trends developed by Romanian historiography in order to inspire loyalty to the Romanian Communist Party. As the article shows, by the early eighties, nationalism and the cult of the leader had become the main trends of this metanarrative. The epilogue briefly points out the continuities and changes produced by the regime change in 1989 for Romanian historiography.Keywords: Historiography; Stalinism; Romania; national communism; politics and history.}},
author = {{Zavatti, Francesco}},
keywords = {{Romania; historiography; Ceausescu; cult of the leader; nationalism}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{39--58}},
publisher = {{Universidad Complutense de Madrid}},
series = {{Cuadernos de Historia Contemporanea}},
title = {{Between History and Power. The Historiography of Romanian National- Communism (1964–1989)}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/chco.71890}},
doi = {{10.5209/chco.71890}},
volume = {{42}},
year = {{2020}},
}