Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

What Kind of Tool Is This? : Exploring the Role of the Incident Report in Counteracting Degrading Behaviour in Schools

Morris, Freja LU (2024)
Abstract
My research centres on a topic that will be familiar to many of you – namely the proliferation of paperwork and documentation demands that characterises work in many contemporary organisations. More specifically, I take as my point of departure a crux from the Swedish education sector, namely that there is a broad will – from actors at all levels of the schooling system – politicians, the Swedish National Agency for Education, principals and (of course) teachers themselves – to reduce the amount of documentation work for teachers but despite this will, there is no evidence that the amount of documentation work is lessening. In fact, surveys conducted by teachers’ unions in 2019 and 2021 show that, in some regards, the burden of... (More)
My research centres on a topic that will be familiar to many of you – namely the proliferation of paperwork and documentation demands that characterises work in many contemporary organisations. More specifically, I take as my point of departure a crux from the Swedish education sector, namely that there is a broad will – from actors at all levels of the schooling system – politicians, the Swedish National Agency for Education, principals and (of course) teachers themselves – to reduce the amount of documentation work for teachers but despite this will, there is no evidence that the amount of documentation work is lessening. In fact, surveys conducted by teachers’ unions in 2019 and 2021 show that, in some regards, the burden of documentation (as it is commonly referred to in Swedish) is getting more demanding. Documents, then, seem impervious to efforts to eliminate them.
My approach to understanding the proliferation and imperviousness of documents has been to foreground the documents themselves. In doing this, I build on other anthropological and sociological research on documents that emphasise the need to bring documents out of their inertia – to see them as more than ‘dead’ things and certainly see them as more than just their content. In this, sometimes called ethnographic, approach to documents it is argued that documents do things – for instance, they enable and constrain action, produce effects. What and how they do things, however, is an empirical question and one that I try to take seriously in my research.
This text is the first analytical chapter of my thesis. I’m writing a monography and will have
my final seminar 31st May. It is a work-in-progress. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to conference
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Governance, Documentation, Document analysis, Bureaucracy, Quantification, materiality
pages
24 pages
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
dd88be4b-92b5-4a72-9341-b0e60e447369
date added to LUP
2025-09-19 11:29:26
date last changed
2025-09-22 09:14:45
@misc{dd88be4b-92b5-4a72-9341-b0e60e447369,
  abstract     = {{My research centres on a topic that will be familiar to many of you – namely the proliferation of paperwork and documentation demands that characterises work in many contemporary organisations. More specifically, I take as my point of departure a crux from the Swedish education sector, namely that there is a broad will – from actors at all levels of the schooling system – politicians, the Swedish National Agency for Education, principals and (of course) teachers themselves – to reduce the amount of documentation work for teachers but despite this will, there is no evidence that the amount of documentation work is lessening. In fact, surveys conducted by teachers’ unions in 2019 and 2021 show that, in some regards, the burden of documentation (as it is commonly referred to in Swedish) is getting more demanding. Documents, then, seem impervious to efforts to eliminate them.<br/>My approach to understanding the proliferation and imperviousness of documents has been to foreground the documents themselves. In doing this, I build on other anthropological and sociological research on documents that emphasise the need to bring documents out of their inertia – to see them as more than ‘dead’ things and certainly see them as more than just their content. In this, sometimes called ethnographic, approach to documents it is argued that documents do things – for instance, they enable and constrain action, produce effects. What and how they do things, however, is an empirical question and one that I try to take seriously in my research. <br/>This text is the first analytical chapter of my thesis. I’m writing a monography and will have<br/>my final seminar 31st May. It is a work-in-progress.}},
  author       = {{Morris, Freja}},
  keywords     = {{Governance; Documentation; Document analysis; Bureaucracy; Quantification; materiality}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{03}},
  title        = {{What Kind of Tool Is This? : Exploring the Role of the Incident Report in Counteracting Degrading Behaviour in Schools}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}