Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Estimated risk of cardiovascular disease and secondary cancers with modern highly conformal radiotherapy for early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma

Maraldo, M. V. ; Brodin, N. P. ; Aznar, M. C. ; Vogelius, I. R. ; Munck af Rosenschöld, P. LU orcid ; Petersen, P. M. and Specht, L. (2013) In Annals of Oncology 24(8). p.2113-2118
Abstract

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have an increased morbidity and mortality from secondary cancers and cardiovascular disease (CD). We evaluate doses with involved node radiotherapy (INRT) delivered as 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or proton therapy (PT), compared with the extensive Mantle Field (MF). Patients and methods: For 27 patients with early-stage, mediastinal HL, treated with chemotherapy and INRT delivered as 3D CRT (30 Gy), we simulated an MF (36 Gy), INRT-VMAT and INRT-PT (30 Gy). Dose to the heart, lungs, and breasts, estimated risks of CD, lung (LC) and breast cancer (BC), and corresponding life years lost (LYL) were compared. Results: 3D CRT, VMAT or PT significantly lower the... (More)

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have an increased morbidity and mortality from secondary cancers and cardiovascular disease (CD). We evaluate doses with involved node radiotherapy (INRT) delivered as 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or proton therapy (PT), compared with the extensive Mantle Field (MF). Patients and methods: For 27 patients with early-stage, mediastinal HL, treated with chemotherapy and INRT delivered as 3D CRT (30 Gy), we simulated an MF (36 Gy), INRT-VMAT and INRT-PT (30 Gy). Dose to the heart, lungs, and breasts, estimated risks of CD, lung (LC) and breast cancer (BC), and corresponding life years lost (LYL) were compared. Results: 3D CRT, VMAT or PT significantly lower the dose to the heart, lungs and breasts and provide lower risk estimates compared with MF, but with substantial patient variability. The risk of CD is not significantly different for 3D CRT versus VMAT. The risk of LC and BC is highest with VMAT. For LYL, PT is the superior modern technique. Conclusions: In early-stage, mediastinal HL modern radiotherapy provides superior results compared with MF. However, there is no single best radiotherapy technique for HL-the decision should be made at the individual patient level.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Cardiovascular disease, Highly conformal radiotherapy, Hodgkin lymphoma, Involved node radiotherapy, Secondary cancers
in
Annals of Oncology
volume
24
issue
8
pages
2113 - 2118
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • pmid:23619032
  • scopus:84881239116
ISSN
0923-7534
DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdt156
language
English
LU publication?
no
additional info
Funding Information: This work was supported by the Rigshospitalet Scientific Committee.
id
dfa2a612-2fde-467c-9a16-cc443e60127b
date added to LUP
2023-07-19 17:04:20
date last changed
2024-04-20 00:47:07
@article{dfa2a612-2fde-467c-9a16-cc443e60127b,
  abstract     = {{<p>Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have an increased morbidity and mortality from secondary cancers and cardiovascular disease (CD). We evaluate doses with involved node radiotherapy (INRT) delivered as 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or proton therapy (PT), compared with the extensive Mantle Field (MF). Patients and methods: For 27 patients with early-stage, mediastinal HL, treated with chemotherapy and INRT delivered as 3D CRT (30 Gy), we simulated an MF (36 Gy), INRT-VMAT and INRT-PT (30 Gy). Dose to the heart, lungs, and breasts, estimated risks of CD, lung (LC) and breast cancer (BC), and corresponding life years lost (LYL) were compared. Results: 3D CRT, VMAT or PT significantly lower the dose to the heart, lungs and breasts and provide lower risk estimates compared with MF, but with substantial patient variability. The risk of CD is not significantly different for 3D CRT versus VMAT. The risk of LC and BC is highest with VMAT. For LYL, PT is the superior modern technique. Conclusions: In early-stage, mediastinal HL modern radiotherapy provides superior results compared with MF. However, there is no single best radiotherapy technique for HL-the decision should be made at the individual patient level.</p>}},
  author       = {{Maraldo, M. V. and Brodin, N. P. and Aznar, M. C. and Vogelius, I. R. and Munck af Rosenschöld, P. and Petersen, P. M. and Specht, L.}},
  issn         = {{0923-7534}},
  keywords     = {{Cardiovascular disease; Highly conformal radiotherapy; Hodgkin lymphoma; Involved node radiotherapy; Secondary cancers}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{2113--2118}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{Annals of Oncology}},
  title        = {{Estimated risk of cardiovascular disease and secondary cancers with modern highly conformal radiotherapy for early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt156}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/annonc/mdt156}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}