Automatic computerized perimetry in the detection of neurological visual field defects. A pilot study
(1978) In Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie 206(1). p.11-15- Abstract
Forty-seven eyes from 25 patients with neurological disease were examined with an automatic computerized perimeter primarily intended for glaucoma. Manual kinetic and static perimetry with Goldmann's instrument was used for comparison. In 32 fields, the automatic method disclosed all defects that had been found by manual perimetry. Furthermore, it detected three small defects that had been missed in the initial manual examination. The remaining 12 fields were normally using both methods. Consequently, in detecting field defects, the automatic perimeter was superior to the manual method.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/e29df113-84bd-459d-be33-0496f75dda3d
- author
- Bynke, H LU and Heijl, A LU
- publishing date
- 1978-04-07
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- keywords
- Amblyopia/complications, Brain Neoplasms/complications, Computers, Humans, Nervous System Diseases/complications, Optic Neuritis/complications, Vision Disorders/diagnosis, Visual Field Tests/methods, Visual Fields
- in
- Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie
- volume
- 206
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 5 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:306205
- scopus:0017851324
- ISSN
- 0065-6100
- DOI
- 10.1007/bf00411332
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- e29df113-84bd-459d-be33-0496f75dda3d
- date added to LUP
- 2019-06-30 19:26:33
- date last changed
- 2024-01-01 14:47:23
@article{e29df113-84bd-459d-be33-0496f75dda3d, abstract = {{<p>Forty-seven eyes from 25 patients with neurological disease were examined with an automatic computerized perimeter primarily intended for glaucoma. Manual kinetic and static perimetry with Goldmann's instrument was used for comparison. In 32 fields, the automatic method disclosed all defects that had been found by manual perimetry. Furthermore, it detected three small defects that had been missed in the initial manual examination. The remaining 12 fields were normally using both methods. Consequently, in detecting field defects, the automatic perimeter was superior to the manual method.</p>}}, author = {{Bynke, H and Heijl, A}}, issn = {{0065-6100}}, keywords = {{Amblyopia/complications; Brain Neoplasms/complications; Computers; Humans; Nervous System Diseases/complications; Optic Neuritis/complications; Vision Disorders/diagnosis; Visual Field Tests/methods; Visual Fields}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{04}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{11--15}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, series = {{Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie}}, title = {{Automatic computerized perimetry in the detection of neurological visual field defects. A pilot study}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00411332}}, doi = {{10.1007/bf00411332}}, volume = {{206}}, year = {{1978}}, }