RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate, CAS Registry Number 6413-10-1
(2018) In Food and Chemical Toxicology 122. p.438-444- Abstract
Ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate (CAS # 6413-10-1) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not genotoxic. Data from ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate show that there are no safety concerns for skin sensitization under the current, declared levels of use. Data on ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose, developmental, and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class III material, and the exposure... (More)
Ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate (CAS # 6413-10-1) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not genotoxic. Data from ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate show that there are no safety concerns for skin sensitization under the current, declared levels of use. Data on ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose, developmental, and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class III material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is below the TTC (0.47 mg/day). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. For the environmental endpoints, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients (i.e., PEC/PNEC) for the aquatic environment based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America are <1.
(Less)
- author
- publishing date
- 2018
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- volume
- 122
- pages
- 438 - 444
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85054163595
- pmid:30287335
- ISSN
- 0278-6915
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.076
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- e45e09ac-6257-4c4c-946f-6625f861c245
- date added to LUP
- 2018-11-02 13:20:30
- date last changed
- 2024-01-15 05:48:48
@article{e45e09ac-6257-4c4c-946f-6625f861c245, abstract = {{<p>Ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate (CAS # 6413-10-1) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not genotoxic. Data from ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate show that there are no safety concerns for skin sensitization under the current, declared levels of use. Data on ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose, developmental, and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class III material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is below the TTC (0.47 mg/day). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. For the environmental endpoints, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients (i.e., PEC/PNEC) for the aquatic environment based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America are <1.</p>}}, author = {{Api, A. M. and Belsito, D. and Botelho, D. and Bruze, M. and Burton, G. A. and Buschmann, J. and Dagli, M. L. and Date, M. and Dekant, W. and Deodhar, C. and Francis, M. and Fryer, A. D. and Jones, L. and Joshi, K. and La Cava, S. and Lapczynski, A. and Liebler, D. C. and O'Brien, D. and Patel, A. and Penning, T. M. and Ritacco, G. and Romine, J. and Sadekar, N. and Salvito, D. and Schultz, T. W. and Sipes, I. G. and Sullivan, G. and Thakkar, Y. and Tokura, Y. and Tsang, S.}}, issn = {{0278-6915}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{438--444}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Food and Chemical Toxicology}}, title = {{RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate, CAS Registry Number 6413-10-1}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.076}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.076}}, volume = {{122}}, year = {{2018}}, }