Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate, CAS Registry Number 6413-10-1

Api, A. M. ; Belsito, D. ; Botelho, D. ; Bruze, M. LU ; Burton, G. A. ; Buschmann, J. ; Dagli, M. L. ; Date, M. ; Dekant, W. and Deodhar, C. , et al. (2018) In Food and Chemical Toxicology 122. p.438-444
Abstract

Ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate (CAS # 6413-10-1) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not genotoxic. Data from ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate show that there are no safety concerns for skin sensitization under the current, declared levels of use. Data on ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose, developmental, and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class III material, and the exposure... (More)

Ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate (CAS # 6413-10-1) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not genotoxic. Data from ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate show that there are no safety concerns for skin sensitization under the current, declared levels of use. Data on ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose, developmental, and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class III material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is below the TTC (0.47 mg/day). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. For the environmental endpoints, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients (i.e., PEC/PNEC) for the aquatic environment based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America are <1.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Food and Chemical Toxicology
volume
122
pages
438 - 444
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85054163595
  • pmid:30287335
ISSN
0278-6915
DOI
10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.076
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
e45e09ac-6257-4c4c-946f-6625f861c245
date added to LUP
2018-11-02 13:20:30
date last changed
2024-01-15 05:48:48
@article{e45e09ac-6257-4c4c-946f-6625f861c245,
  abstract     = {{<p>Ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate (CAS # 6413-10-1) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not genotoxic. Data from ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate show that there are no safety concerns for skin sensitization under the current, declared levels of use. Data on ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate provide a calculated MOE &gt;100 for the repeated dose, developmental, and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class III material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is below the TTC (0.47 mg/day). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. For the environmental endpoints, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate is not PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients (i.e., PEC/PNEC) for the aquatic environment based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America are &lt;1.</p>}},
  author       = {{Api, A. M. and Belsito, D. and Botelho, D. and Bruze, M. and Burton, G. A. and Buschmann, J. and Dagli, M. L. and Date, M. and Dekant, W. and Deodhar, C. and Francis, M. and Fryer, A. D. and Jones, L. and Joshi, K. and La Cava, S. and Lapczynski, A. and Liebler, D. C. and O'Brien, D. and Patel, A. and Penning, T. M. and Ritacco, G. and Romine, J. and Sadekar, N. and Salvito, D. and Schultz, T. W. and Sipes, I. G. and Sullivan, G. and Thakkar, Y. and Tokura, Y. and Tsang, S.}},
  issn         = {{0278-6915}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{438--444}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Food and Chemical Toxicology}},
  title        = {{RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane-2-acetate, CAS Registry Number 6413-10-1}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.076}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.076}},
  volume       = {{122}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}