Butterfly dichromatism primarily evolved via Darwin's, not Wallace's, model
(2020) In Evolution letters 4(6). p.545-555- Abstract
- Sexual dimorphism is typically thought to result from sexual selection for elaborated male traits, as proposed by Darwin. However, natural selection could reduce expression of elaborated traits in females, as proposed by Wallace. Darwin and Wallace debated the origins of dichromatism in birds and butterflies, and although evidence in birds is roughly equal, if not in favor of Wallace's model, butterflies lack a similar scale of study. Here, we present a large‐scale comparative phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of butterfly coloration, using all European non‐hesperiid butterfly species (n = 369). We modeled evolutionary changes in coloration for each species and sex along their phylogeny, thereby estimating the rate and direction of... (More)
- Sexual dimorphism is typically thought to result from sexual selection for elaborated male traits, as proposed by Darwin. However, natural selection could reduce expression of elaborated traits in females, as proposed by Wallace. Darwin and Wallace debated the origins of dichromatism in birds and butterflies, and although evidence in birds is roughly equal, if not in favor of Wallace's model, butterflies lack a similar scale of study. Here, we present a large‐scale comparative phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of butterfly coloration, using all European non‐hesperiid butterfly species (n = 369). We modeled evolutionary changes in coloration for each species and sex along their phylogeny, thereby estimating the rate and direction of evolution in three‐dimensional color space using a novel implementation of phylogenetic ridge regression. We show that male coloration evolved faster than female coloration, especially in strongly dichromatic clades, with male contribution to changes in dichromatism roughly twice that of females. These patterns are consistent with a classic Darwinian model of dichromatism via sexual selection on male coloration, suggesting this model was the dominant driver of dichromatism in European butterflies. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/e55c4d36-6f50-4c36-96ad-c338a8d2c25d
- author
- Bijl, Wouter ; Zeuss, Dirk ; Chazot, Nicolas LU ; Tunström, Kalle ; Wahlberg, Niklas LU ; Wiklund, Christer ; Fitzpatrick, John L. and Wheat, Christopher W.
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-12-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Evolution letters
- volume
- 4
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 545 - 555
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:33312689
- scopus:85105187870
- ISSN
- 2056-3744
- DOI
- 10.1002/evl3.199
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- e55c4d36-6f50-4c36-96ad-c338a8d2c25d
- date added to LUP
- 2021-04-20 21:17:14
- date last changed
- 2023-02-21 10:03:35
@article{e55c4d36-6f50-4c36-96ad-c338a8d2c25d,
abstract = {{Sexual dimorphism is typically thought to result from sexual selection for elaborated male traits, as proposed by Darwin. However, natural selection could reduce expression of elaborated traits in females, as proposed by Wallace. Darwin and Wallace debated the origins of dichromatism in birds and butterflies, and although evidence in birds is roughly equal, if not in favor of Wallace's model, butterflies lack a similar scale of study. Here, we present a large‐scale comparative phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of butterfly coloration, using all European non‐hesperiid butterfly species (n = 369). We modeled evolutionary changes in coloration for each species and sex along their phylogeny, thereby estimating the rate and direction of evolution in three‐dimensional color space using a novel implementation of phylogenetic ridge regression. We show that male coloration evolved faster than female coloration, especially in strongly dichromatic clades, with male contribution to changes in dichromatism roughly twice that of females. These patterns are consistent with a classic Darwinian model of dichromatism via sexual selection on male coloration, suggesting this model was the dominant driver of dichromatism in European butterflies.}},
author = {{Bijl, Wouter and Zeuss, Dirk and Chazot, Nicolas and Tunström, Kalle and Wahlberg, Niklas and Wiklund, Christer and Fitzpatrick, John L. and Wheat, Christopher W.}},
issn = {{2056-3744}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{12}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{545--555}},
publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
series = {{Evolution letters}},
title = {{Butterfly dichromatism primarily evolved via Darwin's, not Wallace's, model}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.199}},
doi = {{10.1002/evl3.199}},
volume = {{4}},
year = {{2020}},
}