Advanced

Peas and pancakes: On apparent disagreement and (null) light verbs in Swedish

Josefsson, Gunlög LU (2009) Grammar in focus, 2009 32(1). p.35-72
Abstract
Having shown how Construction NOM and Construction PROP differ, I demonstrate that the subject of Construction PROP is clausal. I argue that the topmost XP of the subject phrase of both constructions contains a null neuter element. This accounts for the neuter predicative agreement; hence the idea of default agreement or semantic agreement can be dismissed. I also argue that the subject in (ii) contains a nu P, the head of which is a null light verb. Other instances of null light verbs in Swedish are identified too. Finally, I propose an analysis that accounts for the close relation between Construction PROP and the corresponding construction with a med-phrase 'with -phrase'.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Arter ar gott-sentences, agreement, default gender, disagreement, light, verb, med-phrase, neuter, Pannekaker er godt-sentences, semantic agreement, passepartouts
host publication
Nordic Journal of Linguistics
volume
32
issue
1
pages
35 - 72
publisher
Cambridge University Press
conference name
Grammar in focus, 2009
conference location
Lund, Sweden
conference dates
2009-02-05 - 2009-02-06
external identifiers
  • wos:000266578100002
  • scopus:73649084097
ISSN
0332-5865
1502-4717
DOI
10.1017/S0332586509002030
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Swedish (015011001)
id
e7fda584-cacf-47dd-aa67-9c50b8acbd01 (old id 1443526)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 12:02:35
date last changed
2021-06-16 02:08:23
@inproceedings{e7fda584-cacf-47dd-aa67-9c50b8acbd01,
  abstract     = {Having shown how Construction NOM and Construction PROP differ, I demonstrate that the subject of Construction PROP is clausal. I argue that the topmost XP of the subject phrase of both constructions contains a null neuter element. This accounts for the neuter predicative agreement; hence the idea of default agreement or semantic agreement can be dismissed. I also argue that the subject in (ii) contains a nu P, the head of which is a null light verb. Other instances of null light verbs in Swedish are identified too. Finally, I propose an analysis that accounts for the close relation between Construction PROP and the corresponding construction with a med-phrase 'with -phrase'.},
  author       = {Josefsson, Gunlög},
  booktitle    = {Nordic Journal of Linguistics},
  issn         = {0332-5865},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {35--72},
  publisher    = {Cambridge University Press},
  title        = {Peas and pancakes: On apparent disagreement and (null) light verbs in Swedish},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0332586509002030},
  doi          = {10.1017/S0332586509002030},
  volume       = {32},
  year         = {2009},
}