Household Livelihood Diversification and Gender: Panel Evidence from Rural Kenya
(2019) In Journal of Rural Studies 69. p.156-172- Abstract
- There are high hopes that livelihood diversification could contribute to goals of poverty reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study uses household panel data collected in 2008 and 2013, combined with a mixed methodology to examine the regional and gender disparities, as well as the determinants of change in livelihood diversification in the regions of Nyeri and Kakamega in rural Kenya. The study period was characterised by important structural changes in the composition and sources of household cash incomes. More specifically, farm incomes declined significantly, pushing female headed households into absolute poverty. Whereas nonfarm income share in total household cash incomes increased significantly, especially in Kakamega. The... (More)
- There are high hopes that livelihood diversification could contribute to goals of poverty reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study uses household panel data collected in 2008 and 2013, combined with a mixed methodology to examine the regional and gender disparities, as well as the determinants of change in livelihood diversification in the regions of Nyeri and Kakamega in rural Kenya. The study period was characterised by important structural changes in the composition and sources of household cash incomes. More specifically, farm incomes declined significantly, pushing female headed households into absolute poverty. Whereas nonfarm income share in total household cash incomes increased significantly, especially in Kakamega. The econometric results show that whether or not household fixed effects are included, there is a positive and significant relationship between changes in household asset wealth and changes in livelihood diversification, implying that diversification is mainly an accumulation strategy for wealthier farm households. Increase in livelihood diversification was also determined by the initial level of diversification, household demographic characteristics such as age, gender (being female), education level and hiring labour. In contrast, increased access to agricultural input credit and more secure land rights seemed to promote specialisation in farming rather than diversification. Finally, food security indicators had a positive and significant effect on change in livelihood diversification. The results have implications for development policy in rural Kenya – highlighting the need to harness the positive aspects of livelihood diversification for poverty reduction, while reducing the negative effects on poorer households by reducing asset entry barriers into remunerative activities. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/ed687112-03c5-4df2-8419-85e5351e3c8a
- author
- Alobo Loison, Sarah LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- livelihood diversification, rural Kenya, panel data, gender
- in
- Journal of Rural Studies
- volume
- 69
- pages
- 156 - 172
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85062803723
- ISSN
- 0743-0167
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.001
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- ed687112-03c5-4df2-8419-85e5351e3c8a
- date added to LUP
- 2017-06-01 22:05:14
- date last changed
- 2022-04-25 00:02:54
@article{ed687112-03c5-4df2-8419-85e5351e3c8a,
abstract = {{There are high hopes that livelihood diversification could contribute to goals of poverty reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study uses household panel data collected in 2008 and 2013, combined with a mixed methodology to examine the regional and gender disparities, as well as the determinants of change in livelihood diversification in the regions of Nyeri and Kakamega in rural Kenya. The study period was characterised by important structural changes in the composition and sources of household cash incomes. More specifically, farm incomes declined significantly, pushing female headed households into absolute poverty. Whereas nonfarm income share in total household cash incomes increased significantly, especially in Kakamega. The econometric results show that whether or not household fixed effects are included, there is a positive and significant relationship between changes in household asset wealth and changes in livelihood diversification, implying that diversification is mainly an accumulation strategy for wealthier farm households. Increase in livelihood diversification was also determined by the initial level of diversification, household demographic characteristics such as age, gender (being female), education level and hiring labour. In contrast, increased access to agricultural input credit and more secure land rights seemed to promote specialisation in farming rather than diversification. Finally, food security indicators had a positive and significant effect on change in livelihood diversification. The results have implications for development policy in rural Kenya – highlighting the need to harness the positive aspects of livelihood diversification for poverty reduction, while reducing the negative effects on poorer households by reducing asset entry barriers into remunerative activities.}},
author = {{Alobo Loison, Sarah}},
issn = {{0743-0167}},
keywords = {{livelihood diversification; rural Kenya; panel data; gender}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{156--172}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Journal of Rural Studies}},
title = {{Household Livelihood Diversification and Gender: Panel Evidence from Rural Kenya}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.001}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.001}},
volume = {{69}},
year = {{2019}},
}