Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Thermal and Hydraulic Performances of Carbon and Metallic Oxides-Based Nanomaterials

Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin ; Aldlemy, Mohammed Suleman ; Ahmed, Ali M. ; Jawad, Ali H. ; Naser, Maryam H. ; Homod, Raad Z. ; Mussa, Zainab Haider ; Abdulkadhim, Adnan Hashim ; Scholz, Miklas LU and Yaseen, Zaher Mundher (2022) In Nanomaterials 12(9).
Abstract

For companies, notably in the realms of energy and power supply, the essential requirement for highly efficient thermal transport solutions has become a serious concern. Current research highlighted the use of metallic oxides and carbon-based nanofluids as heat transfer fluids. This work examined two carbon forms (PEG@GNPs & PEG@TGr) and two types of metallic oxides (Al2O3 & SiO2) in a square heated pipe in the mass fraction of 0.1 wt.%. Laboratory conditions were as follows: 6401 ≤ Re ≤ 11,907 and wall heat flux = 11,205 W/m2. The effective thermal–physical and heat transfer properties were assessed for fully developed turbulent fluid flow at 20–60 °C. The thermal and hydraulic performances of nanofluids were rated in terms of... (More)

For companies, notably in the realms of energy and power supply, the essential requirement for highly efficient thermal transport solutions has become a serious concern. Current research highlighted the use of metallic oxides and carbon-based nanofluids as heat transfer fluids. This work examined two carbon forms (PEG@GNPs & PEG@TGr) and two types of metallic oxides (Al2O3 & SiO2) in a square heated pipe in the mass fraction of 0.1 wt.%. Laboratory conditions were as follows: 6401 ≤ Re ≤ 11,907 and wall heat flux = 11,205 W/m2. The effective thermal–physical and heat transfer properties were assessed for fully developed turbulent fluid flow at 20–60 °C. The thermal and hydraulic performances of nanofluids were rated in terms of pumping power, performance index (PI), and performance evaluation criteria (PEC). The heat transfer coefficients of the nanofluids improved the most: PEG@GNPs = 44.4%, PEG@TGr = 41.2%, Al2O3 = 22.5%, and SiO2 = 24%. Meanwhile, the highest augmentation in the Nu of the nanofluids was as follows: PEG@GNPs = 35%, PEG@TGr = 30.1%, Al2O3 = 20.6%, and SiO2 = 21.9%. The pressure loss and friction factor increased the highest, by 20.8–23.7% and 3.57–3.85%, respectively. In the end, the general performance of nanofluids has shown that they would be a good alternative to the traditional working fluids in heat transfer requests.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
carbon nanostructures, convective heat transfer, metallic oxides, thermophysical properties, turbulent flow
in
Nanomaterials
volume
12
issue
9
article number
1545
publisher
MDPI AG
external identifiers
  • pmid:35564254
  • scopus:85130841256
ISSN
2079-4991
DOI
10.3390/nano12091545
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
efc68a8e-820d-42de-87df-bcbe0beb7963
date added to LUP
2022-09-28 12:27:07
date last changed
2024-11-29 14:15:54
@article{efc68a8e-820d-42de-87df-bcbe0beb7963,
  abstract     = {{<p>For companies, notably in the realms of energy and power supply, the essential requirement for highly efficient thermal transport solutions has become a serious concern. Current research highlighted the use of metallic oxides and carbon-based nanofluids as heat transfer fluids. This work examined two carbon forms (PEG@GNPs &amp; PEG@TGr) and two types of metallic oxides (Al2O3 &amp; SiO2) in a square heated pipe in the mass fraction of 0.1 wt.%. Laboratory conditions were as follows: 6401 ≤ Re ≤ 11,907 and wall heat flux = 11,205 W/m2. The effective thermal–physical and heat transfer properties were assessed for fully developed turbulent fluid flow at 20–60 °C. The thermal and hydraulic performances of nanofluids were rated in terms of pumping power, performance index (PI), and performance evaluation criteria (PEC). The heat transfer coefficients of the nanofluids improved the most: PEG@GNPs = 44.4%, PEG@TGr = 41.2%, Al2O3 = 22.5%, and SiO2 = 24%. Meanwhile, the highest augmentation in the Nu of the nanofluids was as follows: PEG@GNPs = 35%, PEG@TGr = 30.1%, Al2O3 = 20.6%, and SiO2 = 21.9%. The pressure loss and friction factor increased the highest, by 20.8–23.7% and 3.57–3.85%, respectively. In the end, the general performance of nanofluids has shown that they would be a good alternative to the traditional working fluids in heat transfer requests.</p>}},
  author       = {{Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin and Aldlemy, Mohammed Suleman and Ahmed, Ali M. and Jawad, Ali H. and Naser, Maryam H. and Homod, Raad Z. and Mussa, Zainab Haider and Abdulkadhim, Adnan Hashim and Scholz, Miklas and Yaseen, Zaher Mundher}},
  issn         = {{2079-4991}},
  keywords     = {{carbon nanostructures; convective heat transfer; metallic oxides; thermophysical properties; turbulent flow}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{05}},
  number       = {{9}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  series       = {{Nanomaterials}},
  title        = {{Thermal and Hydraulic Performances of Carbon and Metallic Oxides-Based Nanomaterials}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12091545}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/nano12091545}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}