Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

DOSIMETRY AND CANCER RISK ESTIMATIONS FOR DIFFERENT RADIATION PROTECTION SOLUTIONS AT DECOMMISSIONING A CONTAMINATED NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SITE

Andersson, Martin LU ; Eckerman, Keith and Ören, Ünal LU (2022) In Radiation Protection Dosimetry 198(19). p.1516-1521
Abstract

Contaminated sediments originating from dredging activities in a nuclear power plant site were placed in a pond, which has to be taken into consideration during the future decommissioning process. The sediments have to be handled to free release the site. The radionuclides Co-60 and Cs-137 were identified and the activity concentrations (Bq/kg) were quantified in the range of 10-6000 and 5-50 Bq kg-1, respectively. The absorbed dose rate to individuals of various ages and sex present at the site of the dry pond area was estimated. The radiological impact in terms of lifetime attributable risk (LAR) and effective dose were calculated. For a 30-year-old male exposed during one year without any action regarding the sediments in the dried... (More)

Contaminated sediments originating from dredging activities in a nuclear power plant site were placed in a pond, which has to be taken into consideration during the future decommissioning process. The sediments have to be handled to free release the site. The radionuclides Co-60 and Cs-137 were identified and the activity concentrations (Bq/kg) were quantified in the range of 10-6000 and 5-50 Bq kg-1, respectively. The absorbed dose rate to individuals of various ages and sex present at the site of the dry pond area was estimated. The radiological impact in terms of lifetime attributable risk (LAR) and effective dose were calculated. For a 30-year-old male exposed during one year without any action regarding the sediments in the dried out pond, the LAR was predicted to be 0.0027, which recalculated to effective dose corresponds to 7.6 mSv year-1. The calculations show that countermeasures will be needed for the contaminated site.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
volume
198
issue
19
pages
6 pages
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • pmid:36177649
  • scopus:85152912924
ISSN
0144-8420
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncac192
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f1918317-c6f7-4f64-ad13-7bbc9b415a6b
date added to LUP
2023-08-15 11:08:21
date last changed
2024-04-05 22:14:14
@article{f1918317-c6f7-4f64-ad13-7bbc9b415a6b,
  abstract     = {{<p>Contaminated sediments originating from dredging activities in a nuclear power plant site were placed in a pond, which has to be taken into consideration during the future decommissioning process. The sediments have to be handled to free release the site. The radionuclides Co-60 and Cs-137 were identified and the activity concentrations (Bq/kg) were quantified in the range of 10-6000 and 5-50 Bq kg-1, respectively. The absorbed dose rate to individuals of various ages and sex present at the site of the dry pond area was estimated. The radiological impact in terms of lifetime attributable risk (LAR) and effective dose were calculated. For a 30-year-old male exposed during one year without any action regarding the sediments in the dried out pond, the LAR was predicted to be 0.0027, which recalculated to effective dose corresponds to 7.6 mSv year-1. The calculations show that countermeasures will be needed for the contaminated site.</p>}},
  author       = {{Andersson, Martin and Eckerman, Keith and Ören, Ünal}},
  issn         = {{0144-8420}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{11}},
  number       = {{19}},
  pages        = {{1516--1521}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{Radiation Protection Dosimetry}},
  title        = {{DOSIMETRY AND CANCER RISK ESTIMATIONS FOR DIFFERENT RADIATION PROTECTION SOLUTIONS AT DECOMMISSIONING A CONTAMINATED NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SITE}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac192}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/rpd/ncac192}},
  volume       = {{198}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}