Implementing Web 2.0 Design Patterns in an Institutional Repository May Increase Community Participation
(2011) In Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 6(3). p.74-76- Abstract
- Abstract in Undetermined
Objective – To investigate whether Web 2.0 can enhance participation in institutional repositories (IRs) and whether its widespread use can lead to success in this context. Another purpose was to emphasize how an IR with a Web 2.0 approach can connect individuals in their creative and intellectual outputs, no matter what form of shared material is contributed.
Design – Comparative study.
Setting –Two IRs at Teachers College, Columbia University, which is a graduate and professional school of education in New York City.
Subjects – Students, faculty, and staff using the PocketKnowledge and CPC IRs.
Methods – Cocciolo compared two different IRs called PocketKnowledge and Community Program... (More) - Abstract in Undetermined
Objective – To investigate whether Web 2.0 can enhance participation in institutional repositories (IRs) and whether its widespread use can lead to success in this context. Another purpose was to emphasize how an IR with a Web 2.0 approach can connect individuals in their creative and intellectual outputs, no matter what form of shared material is contributed.
Design – Comparative study.
Setting –Two IRs at Teachers College, Columbia University, which is a graduate and professional school of education in New York City.
Subjects – Students, faculty, and staff using the PocketKnowledge and CPC IRs.
Methods – Cocciolo compared two different IRs called PocketKnowledge and Community Program Collections (CPC). PocketKnowledge had the following Web 2.0 design patterns: users control their own data; users should be trusted; flexible tags are preferred over hierarchical taxonomies; the attitude should be playful; (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2338138
- author
- Hultman Özek, Yvonne LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2011
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
- volume
- 6
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 74 - 76
- publisher
- University of Alberta Learning Services
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84859715665
- ISSN
- 1715-720X
- DOI
- 10.18438/B8633S
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Evidence summary
- id
- f192dec2-8b9e-4b2a-9b0d-aebd6b457e82 (old id 2338138)
- alternative location
- http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/9932
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 13:13:35
- date last changed
- 2022-01-27 18:02:07
@article{f192dec2-8b9e-4b2a-9b0d-aebd6b457e82, abstract = {{Abstract in Undetermined<br/>Objective – To investigate whether Web 2.0 can enhance participation in institutional repositories (IRs) and whether its widespread use can lead to success in this context. Another purpose was to emphasize how an IR with a Web 2.0 approach can connect individuals in their creative and intellectual outputs, no matter what form of shared material is contributed.<br/>Design – Comparative study.<br/>Setting –Two IRs at Teachers College, Columbia University, which is a graduate and professional school of education in New York City.<br/>Subjects – Students, faculty, and staff using the PocketKnowledge and CPC IRs.<br/>Methods – Cocciolo compared two different IRs called PocketKnowledge and Community Program Collections (CPC). PocketKnowledge had the following Web 2.0 design patterns: users control their own data; users should be trusted; flexible tags are preferred over hierarchical taxonomies; the attitude should be playful;}}, author = {{Hultman Özek, Yvonne}}, issn = {{1715-720X}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{74--76}}, publisher = {{University of Alberta Learning Services}}, series = {{Evidence Based Library and Information Practice}}, title = {{Implementing Web 2.0 Design Patterns in an Institutional Repository May Increase Community Participation}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/3241506/2338151.pdf}}, doi = {{10.18438/B8633S}}, volume = {{6}}, year = {{2011}}, }