Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The Evolution of Visual Roles – Ancient Vision Versus Object Vision

Nilsson, Dan Eric LU (2022) In Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 16.
Abstract

Just like other complex biological features, image vision (multi-pixel light sensing) did not evolve suddenly. Animal visual systems have a long prehistory of non-imaging light sensitivity. The first spatial vision was likely very crude with only few pixels, and evolved to improve orientation behaviors previously supported by single-channel directional photoreception. The origin of image vision was simply a switch from single to multiple spatial channels, which improved the behaviors for finding a suitable habitat and position itself within it. Orientation based on spatial vision obviously involves active guidance of behaviors but, by necessity, also assessment of habitat suitability and environmental conditions. These conditions are... (More)

Just like other complex biological features, image vision (multi-pixel light sensing) did not evolve suddenly. Animal visual systems have a long prehistory of non-imaging light sensitivity. The first spatial vision was likely very crude with only few pixels, and evolved to improve orientation behaviors previously supported by single-channel directional photoreception. The origin of image vision was simply a switch from single to multiple spatial channels, which improved the behaviors for finding a suitable habitat and position itself within it. Orientation based on spatial vision obviously involves active guidance of behaviors but, by necessity, also assessment of habitat suitability and environmental conditions. These conditions are crucial for deciding when to forage, reproduce, seek shelter, rest, etc. When spatial resolution became good enough to see other animals and interact with them, a whole range of new visual roles emerged: pursuit, escape, communication and other interactions. All these new visual roles require entirely new types of visual processing. Objects needed to be separated from the background, identified and classified to make the correct choice of interaction. Object detection and identification can be used actively to guide behaviors but of course also to assess the over-all situation. Visual roles can thus be classified as either ancient non-object-based tasks, or object vision. Each of these two categories can also be further divided into active visual tasks and visual assessment tasks. This generates four major categories of vision into which I propose that all visual roles can be categorized.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
behavior, evolution, vision, visual processing, visual role
in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
volume
16
article number
789375
publisher
Frontiers Media S. A.
external identifiers
  • pmid:35221931
  • scopus:85125442370
ISSN
1662-5129
DOI
10.3389/fnana.2022.789375
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f289bc4d-f68c-488c-9e8c-dcc9901d3102
date added to LUP
2022-05-02 11:53:15
date last changed
2024-06-13 12:10:09
@article{f289bc4d-f68c-488c-9e8c-dcc9901d3102,
  abstract     = {{<p>Just like other complex biological features, image vision (multi-pixel light sensing) did not evolve suddenly. Animal visual systems have a long prehistory of non-imaging light sensitivity. The first spatial vision was likely very crude with only few pixels, and evolved to improve orientation behaviors previously supported by single-channel directional photoreception. The origin of image vision was simply a switch from single to multiple spatial channels, which improved the behaviors for finding a suitable habitat and position itself within it. Orientation based on spatial vision obviously involves active guidance of behaviors but, by necessity, also assessment of habitat suitability and environmental conditions. These conditions are crucial for deciding when to forage, reproduce, seek shelter, rest, etc. When spatial resolution became good enough to see other animals and interact with them, a whole range of new visual roles emerged: pursuit, escape, communication and other interactions. All these new visual roles require entirely new types of visual processing. Objects needed to be separated from the background, identified and classified to make the correct choice of interaction. Object detection and identification can be used actively to guide behaviors but of course also to assess the over-all situation. Visual roles can thus be classified as either ancient non-object-based tasks, or object vision. Each of these two categories can also be further divided into active visual tasks and visual assessment tasks. This generates four major categories of vision into which I propose that all visual roles can be categorized.</p>}},
  author       = {{Nilsson, Dan Eric}},
  issn         = {{1662-5129}},
  keywords     = {{behavior; evolution; vision; visual processing; visual role}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Frontiers Media S. A.}},
  series       = {{Frontiers in Neuroanatomy}},
  title        = {{The Evolution of Visual Roles – Ancient Vision Versus Object Vision}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2022.789375}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/fnana.2022.789375}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}