EU Foreign and Security Policy in a Mediatized Age
(2019) p.193-215- Abstract
This chapter provides a critical discussion of the mediatization of policy in general, and of EU foreign and security policy in particular. A common argument in public debate and research is that the media logic is increasingly affecting how policy is formulated. Brommesson and Ekengren are critical of this (as they see it) oversimplified perspective, and they analyse EU foreign and security policy from the opposite point of view in this chapter. Foreign policy is usually described as a conservative policy area, in as much as it is informed by a long-term perspective, and foreign policy is not the subject of public debate to the same extent as other policy areas. Based on this reverse perspective, the authors ask whether policy actors... (More)
This chapter provides a critical discussion of the mediatization of policy in general, and of EU foreign and security policy in particular. A common argument in public debate and research is that the media logic is increasingly affecting how policy is formulated. Brommesson and Ekengren are critical of this (as they see it) oversimplified perspective, and they analyse EU foreign and security policy from the opposite point of view in this chapter. Foreign policy is usually described as a conservative policy area, in as much as it is informed by a long-term perspective, and foreign policy is not the subject of public debate to the same extent as other policy areas. Based on this reverse perspective, the authors ask whether policy actors are actually taking advantage of the opportunities provided by mediatization to strengthen long-term policy objectives. The chapter sheds light on the relationship between policy and mediatization through a comparative analysis of two important strategy documents of EU foreign and security policy: the European security strategy of 2003 and the EU global strategy of 2016. The authors discuss the overarching question of whether the formulation of EU foreign and security policy is dominated by media logic, in other words, whether this policy has been mediatized.
(Less)
- author
- Brommesson, Douglas LU and Ekengren, Ann Marie
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- host publication
- The European Union in a Changing World Order : Interdisciplinary European Studies - Interdisciplinary European Studies
- pages
- 23 pages
- publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85149083158
- ISBN
- 9783030180003
- 9783030180010
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-18001-0_8
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- f50fce7e-a431-47d7-9406-b2e2381cce57
- date added to LUP
- 2023-03-16 08:16:45
- date last changed
- 2024-03-21 04:55:46
@inbook{f50fce7e-a431-47d7-9406-b2e2381cce57,
abstract = {{<p>This chapter provides a critical discussion of the mediatization of policy in general, and of EU foreign and security policy in particular. A common argument in public debate and research is that the media logic is increasingly affecting how policy is formulated. Brommesson and Ekengren are critical of this (as they see it) oversimplified perspective, and they analyse EU foreign and security policy from the opposite point of view in this chapter. Foreign policy is usually described as a conservative policy area, in as much as it is informed by a long-term perspective, and foreign policy is not the subject of public debate to the same extent as other policy areas. Based on this reverse perspective, the authors ask whether policy actors are actually taking advantage of the opportunities provided by mediatization to strengthen long-term policy objectives. The chapter sheds light on the relationship between policy and mediatization through a comparative analysis of two important strategy documents of EU foreign and security policy: the European security strategy of 2003 and the EU global strategy of 2016. The authors discuss the overarching question of whether the formulation of EU foreign and security policy is dominated by media logic, in other words, whether this policy has been mediatized.</p>}},
author = {{Brommesson, Douglas and Ekengren, Ann Marie}},
booktitle = {{The European Union in a Changing World Order : Interdisciplinary European Studies}},
isbn = {{9783030180003}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{193--215}},
publisher = {{Springer International Publishing}},
title = {{EU Foreign and Security Policy in a Mediatized Age}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18001-0_8}},
doi = {{10.1007/978-3-030-18001-0_8}},
year = {{2019}},
}