Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Establishing conversion of the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly scores into interval-level data across multiple samples using Rasch methodology

Truong, Quoc Cuong ; Numbers, Katya ; Choo, Carol C. ; Bentvelzen, Adam C. ; Catts, Vibeke S. ; Cervin, Matti LU ; Jorm, Anthony F. ; Kochan, Nicole A. ; Brodaty, Henry and Sachdev, Perminder S. , et al. (2023) In Psychogeriatrics 23(3). p.411-421
Abstract

Background: The 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16) is a well-validated and widely-used measure of cognitive changes (CCs) among older adults. This study aimed to use Rasch methodology to establish psychometric properties of the IQCODE-16 and validate the existing ordinal-to-interval transformation algorithms across multiple large samples. Methods: A Partial Credit Rasch model was employed to examine psychometric properties of the IQCODE-16 using data (n = 918) from two longitudinal studies of participants aged 57–99 years: the Older Australian Twins Study (n = 450) and the Canberra Longitudinal Study (n = 468), and reusing the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (MAS) sample (n = 400). Results:... (More)

Background: The 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16) is a well-validated and widely-used measure of cognitive changes (CCs) among older adults. This study aimed to use Rasch methodology to establish psychometric properties of the IQCODE-16 and validate the existing ordinal-to-interval transformation algorithms across multiple large samples. Methods: A Partial Credit Rasch model was employed to examine psychometric properties of the IQCODE-16 using data (n = 918) from two longitudinal studies of participants aged 57–99 years: the Older Australian Twins Study (n = 450) and the Canberra Longitudinal Study (n = 468), and reusing the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (MAS) sample (n = 400). Results: Initial analyses indicated good reliability for the IQCODE-16 (Person Separation Index range: 0.82–0.90). However, local dependency was identified between items, with several items showing misfit to the model. Replicating the existing Rasch solution could not reproduce the best Rasch model fit for all samples. Combining locally dependent items into three testlets resolved all misfit and local dependency issues and resulted in the best Rasch model fit for all samples with evidence of unidimensionality, strong reliability, and invariance across person factors. Accordingly, new ordinal-to-interval transformation algorithms were produced to convert the IQCODE-16 ordinal scores into interval data to improve the accuracy of its scores. Conclusions: The findings of this study support the reliability and validity of the IQCODE-16 in measuring CCs among older adults. New ordinal-to-interval conversion tables generated using samples from multiple independent datasets are more generalizable and can be used to enhance the precision of the IQCODE-16 without changing its original format. An easy-to-use converter has been made available for clinical and research use.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
cognitive changes, Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, measurement, Rasch analysis, reliability
in
Psychogeriatrics
volume
23
issue
3
pages
411 - 421
publisher
Wiley
external identifiers
  • scopus:85148020006
  • pmid:36781176
ISSN
1346-3500
DOI
10.1111/psyg.12946
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f5cda0b9-efbc-4a39-a606-e93dd112c6c8
date added to LUP
2023-03-08 11:22:36
date last changed
2024-06-13 13:17:31
@article{f5cda0b9-efbc-4a39-a606-e93dd112c6c8,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: The 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16) is a well-validated and widely-used measure of cognitive changes (CCs) among older adults. This study aimed to use Rasch methodology to establish psychometric properties of the IQCODE-16 and validate the existing ordinal-to-interval transformation algorithms across multiple large samples. Methods: A Partial Credit Rasch model was employed to examine psychometric properties of the IQCODE-16 using data (n = 918) from two longitudinal studies of participants aged 57–99 years: the Older Australian Twins Study (n = 450) and the Canberra Longitudinal Study (n = 468), and reusing the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (MAS) sample (n = 400). Results: Initial analyses indicated good reliability for the IQCODE-16 (Person Separation Index range: 0.82–0.90). However, local dependency was identified between items, with several items showing misfit to the model. Replicating the existing Rasch solution could not reproduce the best Rasch model fit for all samples. Combining locally dependent items into three testlets resolved all misfit and local dependency issues and resulted in the best Rasch model fit for all samples with evidence of unidimensionality, strong reliability, and invariance across person factors. Accordingly, new ordinal-to-interval transformation algorithms were produced to convert the IQCODE-16 ordinal scores into interval data to improve the accuracy of its scores. Conclusions: The findings of this study support the reliability and validity of the IQCODE-16 in measuring CCs among older adults. New ordinal-to-interval conversion tables generated using samples from multiple independent datasets are more generalizable and can be used to enhance the precision of the IQCODE-16 without changing its original format. An easy-to-use converter has been made available for clinical and research use.</p>}},
  author       = {{Truong, Quoc Cuong and Numbers, Katya and Choo, Carol C. and Bentvelzen, Adam C. and Catts, Vibeke S. and Cervin, Matti and Jorm, Anthony F. and Kochan, Nicole A. and Brodaty, Henry and Sachdev, Perminder S. and Medvedev, Oleg N.}},
  issn         = {{1346-3500}},
  keywords     = {{cognitive changes; Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly; measurement; Rasch analysis; reliability}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{411--421}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  series       = {{Psychogeriatrics}},
  title        = {{Establishing conversion of the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly scores into interval-level data across multiple samples using Rasch methodology}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12946}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/psyg.12946}},
  volume       = {{23}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}