Socializing Warlord Democrats: Analyzing Violent Discursive Practices in Post-Civil War Politics
Sjöstedt, Roxanna LU
; Söderberg Kovacs, Mimmi
; Themnér, Anders
and Persson, Henrik
(2024)
In International Studies Review
26(1).
- Abstract
- Across the world, so-called warlord democrats (WDs) – former military or political leaders of armed groups who subsequently enter formal electoral politics – strongly influence the dynamics and trajectory of post-civil war politics. However, scholarship on war-to-peace transitions and post-conflict politics have often failed to pay attention to the agency of these important actors. This article rectifies this oversight, and thereby adds to the overarching scholarly debate on what enhances or hampers democratic processes after violent conflict. It makes two main contributions. First, by putting an explicit focus on the individual level of analysis and on the agency of WDs, the article opens up an avenue of research that previously has been... (More)
- Across the world, so-called warlord democrats (WDs) – former military or political leaders of armed groups who subsequently enter formal electoral politics – strongly influence the dynamics and trajectory of post-civil war politics. However, scholarship on war-to-peace transitions and post-conflict politics have often failed to pay attention to the agency of these important actors. This article rectifies this oversight, and thereby adds to the overarching scholarly debate on what enhances or hampers democratic processes after violent conflict. It makes two main contributions. First, by putting an explicit focus on the individual level of analysis and on the agency of WDs, the article opens up an avenue of research that previously has been black-boxed. Second, it demonstrates that the assumptions of socialization theory are particular suitable for enhancing our understanding of variations in the agency of WDs and their impact on post-conflict electoral politics. A novel analytical framework that refines the concept guides the empirical examination of the socialization processes of two WDs over time: Julius Maada Bio, the ex-junta leader who became President of Sierra Leone and Prince Johnson, the ex-warlord in Liberia who became Senator and presidential candidate. The findings suggest that the socialization theory holds promise as a new perspective on the study of WDs, but the theory may also need additional conceptual development and adjustment when applied outside its traditional empirical context and at the individual levels of analysis. Specifically, we find that the democratic socialization of our selected WDs display the characteristics of hybrid socialization, where conflicting normative frameworks result in lopsided socialization processes. But more research is needed on how to empirically distinguish between cost-benefit calculations and a logic of appropriateness, the long-term implications of hybrid socialization, and how to theoretically reconcile individual level socialization processes with that of states or groups. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/f8dbe858-1729-4b52-88e8-4c951cde15ea
- author
- Sjöstedt, Roxanna
LU
; Söderberg Kovacs, Mimmi
; Themnér, Anders
and Persson, Henrik
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- socialization, Warlord democrats, post-civil war politics
- in
- International Studies Review
- volume
- 26
- issue
- 1
- article number
- viae005
- publisher
- Oxford University Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85185783987
- ISSN
- 1521-9488
- DOI
- 10.1093/isr/viae005
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- f8dbe858-1729-4b52-88e8-4c951cde15ea
- date added to LUP
- 2024-02-19 21:15:46
- date last changed
- 2024-03-20 11:49:03
@article{f8dbe858-1729-4b52-88e8-4c951cde15ea,
abstract = {{Across the world, so-called warlord democrats (WDs) – former military or political leaders of armed groups who subsequently enter formal electoral politics – strongly influence the dynamics and trajectory of post-civil war politics. However, scholarship on war-to-peace transitions and post-conflict politics have often failed to pay attention to the agency of these important actors. This article rectifies this oversight, and thereby adds to the overarching scholarly debate on what enhances or hampers democratic processes after violent conflict. It makes two main contributions. First, by putting an explicit focus on the individual level of analysis and on the agency of WDs, the article opens up an avenue of research that previously has been black-boxed. Second, it demonstrates that the assumptions of socialization theory are particular suitable for enhancing our understanding of variations in the agency of WDs and their impact on post-conflict electoral politics. A novel analytical framework that refines the concept guides the empirical examination of the socialization processes of two WDs over time: Julius Maada Bio, the ex-junta leader who became President of Sierra Leone and Prince Johnson, the ex-warlord in Liberia who became Senator and presidential candidate. The findings suggest that the socialization theory holds promise as a new perspective on the study of WDs, but the theory may also need additional conceptual development and adjustment when applied outside its traditional empirical context and at the individual levels of analysis. Specifically, we find that the democratic socialization of our selected WDs display the characteristics of hybrid socialization, where conflicting normative frameworks result in lopsided socialization processes. But more research is needed on how to empirically distinguish between cost-benefit calculations and a logic of appropriateness, the long-term implications of hybrid socialization, and how to theoretically reconcile individual level socialization processes with that of states or groups.}},
author = {{Sjöstedt, Roxanna and Söderberg Kovacs, Mimmi and Themnér, Anders and Persson, Henrik}},
issn = {{1521-9488}},
keywords = {{socialization; Warlord democrats; post-civil war politics}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
publisher = {{Oxford University Press}},
series = {{International Studies Review}},
title = {{Socializing Warlord Democrats: Analyzing Violent Discursive Practices in Post-Civil War Politics}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isr/viae005}},
doi = {{10.1093/isr/viae005}},
volume = {{26}},
year = {{2024}},
}