Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Agonistic interaction in practice : laughing, dissensus and hegemony in the Northern Ireland Assembly

Bramsen, Isabel LU orcid (2022) In Third World Quarterly 43(6). p.1324-1342
Abstract

The 1998 Agreement in Northern Ireland has often been portrayed as a textbook example of agonistic peace allowing parties to continue conflict in a political, adversarial manner post accord. Here, I investigate the institutional and dialogical reality of this claim by scrutinising agonistic aspects of interaction occurring in the Northern Ireland Assembly. Specifically, I analyse a video recording of the first sitting after the Assembly did not sit between 2017 and 2020. The debate provides a snapshot of the situation in Northern Ireland and gives insights into what agonistic interaction looks like in practice. The meeting reveals mutual acceptance of radically different identities and perceptions of the past as well as a jovial mode of... (More)

The 1998 Agreement in Northern Ireland has often been portrayed as a textbook example of agonistic peace allowing parties to continue conflict in a political, adversarial manner post accord. Here, I investigate the institutional and dialogical reality of this claim by scrutinising agonistic aspects of interaction occurring in the Northern Ireland Assembly. Specifically, I analyse a video recording of the first sitting after the Assembly did not sit between 2017 and 2020. The debate provides a snapshot of the situation in Northern Ireland and gives insights into what agonistic interaction looks like in practice. The meeting reveals mutual acceptance of radically different identities and perceptions of the past as well as a jovial mode of interaction with elements of self-irony displaying an ability to hold identities and positions lightly. However, the room for counter-hegemonic discourses and passionate, intense contestation about difficult issues is very limited at the meeting. Rather, the Assembly shapes up as a theatre of opposition where Sinn Féin and the Democratic Unionist Party perform opposition while forming a new hegemony. Taking the opening debate as a point of departure, I discuss questions regarding inclusion, passionate debate and hegemony that the Northern Irish case poses for agonistic peace.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
agonistic peace, dialogue, humour, identity, Northern Ireland, video data analysis
in
Third World Quarterly
volume
43
issue
6
pages
1324 - 1342
publisher
Taylor & Francis
external identifiers
  • scopus:85118128149
ISSN
0143-6597
DOI
10.1080/01436597.2021.1976631
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
id
f966f574-7999-4c88-9b77-ed0e8dfdd043
date added to LUP
2021-11-24 09:23:03
date last changed
2022-06-30 16:24:53
@article{f966f574-7999-4c88-9b77-ed0e8dfdd043,
  abstract     = {{<p>The 1998 Agreement in Northern Ireland has often been portrayed as a textbook example of agonistic peace allowing parties to continue conflict in a political, adversarial manner post accord. Here, I investigate the institutional and dialogical reality of this claim by scrutinising agonistic aspects of interaction occurring in the Northern Ireland Assembly. Specifically, I analyse a video recording of the first sitting after the Assembly did not sit between 2017 and 2020. The debate provides a snapshot of the situation in Northern Ireland and gives insights into what agonistic interaction looks like in practice. The meeting reveals mutual acceptance of radically different identities and perceptions of the past as well as a jovial mode of interaction with elements of self-irony displaying an ability to hold identities and positions lightly. However, the room for counter-hegemonic discourses and passionate, intense contestation about difficult issues is very limited at the meeting. Rather, the Assembly shapes up as a theatre of opposition where Sinn Féin and the Democratic Unionist Party perform opposition while forming a new hegemony. Taking the opening debate as a point of departure, I discuss questions regarding inclusion, passionate debate and hegemony that the Northern Irish case poses for agonistic peace.</p>}},
  author       = {{Bramsen, Isabel}},
  issn         = {{0143-6597}},
  keywords     = {{agonistic peace; dialogue; humour; identity; Northern Ireland; video data analysis}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1324--1342}},
  publisher    = {{Taylor & Francis}},
  series       = {{Third World Quarterly}},
  title        = {{Agonistic interaction in practice : laughing, dissensus and hegemony in the Northern Ireland Assembly}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1976631}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/01436597.2021.1976631}},
  volume       = {{43}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}