1 – 10 of 31
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2015
-
Mark
Skin care products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method can not be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients.
2015) In British Journal of Dermatology(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2014
-
Mark
Repeated open application test with methylisothiazolinone in individuals sensitive to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Patch testing with serial dilutions of various isothiazolinones in patients hypersensitive to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 200 ppm aq. detects significantly more contact allergy than 100 ppm. A multicentre study within the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Can methylisothiazolinone be patch tested in petrolatum?
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Multicentre patch testing with methylisothiazolinone by the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
- 2011
-
Mark
Patch Testing with a Textile Dye Mix in a Baseline Series in Two Countries
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Clinically relevant contact allergy to formaldehyde may be missed by testing with formaldehyde 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2010
-
Mark
Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Routine diagnostic patch-testing with formaldehyde 2.0% (0.6 mg/cm2) may be an advantage compared to 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article