1 – 10 of 18
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2021
-
Mark
How to play the final chess match—or at least lose with dignity
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
- 2020
-
Mark
Intyg för assisterat döende i Schweiz väcker svåra frågor
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2018
-
Mark
Easier to see the speck in your critical peers' eyes than the log in your own? Response to Debelle et al
(
- Contribution to journal › Letter
-
Mark
Pouring out the dirty bathwater without throwing away either the baby or its parents : commentary to Saunders et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Traumatic shaking : The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking
(
- Contribution to journal › Scientific review
- 2017
-
Mark
Conflicts of interest issues. Response to Lucas et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
A misunderstanding. Response to Dr Bilo et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The shaken baby syndrome report was not the result of a conspiracy. Response to Dr. Narang et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The scientific evidence regarding retinal haemorrhages. Response to Hellgren et al. and Levin
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Authors' overarching reply to all the responses received to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial