1 – 10 of 12
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2015
-
Mark
Skin care products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method can not be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients.
2015) In British Journal of Dermatology(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2011
-
Mark
Clinically relevant contact allergy to formaldehyde may be missed by testing with formaldehyde 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2010
-
Mark
Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Routine diagnostic patch-testing with formaldehyde 2.0% (0.6 mg/cm2) may be an advantage compared to 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2006
-
Mark
The validity of a questionnaire-based epidemiological study of occupational dermatosis
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2005
-
Mark
Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromoglutaronitrile.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Risk of contact allergy and dermatitis at a wind turbine plant using epoxy resin-based plastics
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2004
-
Mark
Epoxy-based production of wind turbine rotor blades: occupational contact allergies.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Associations between contact allergy to epoxy resin and fragrance mix
(
- Contribution to journal › Letter
-
Mark
Epoxy-based production of wind turbine rotor blades: occupational dermatoses.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article