1 – 10 of 13
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2017
-
Mark
Conflicts of interest issues. Response to Lucas et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
A misunderstanding. Response to Dr Bilo et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct?
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Shaken baby syndrome and the risk of losing scientific scrutiny
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Authors' overarching reply to all the responses received to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The scientific evidence regarding retinal haemorrhages. Response to Hellgren et al. and Levin
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Insufficient evidence for 'shaken baby syndrome' - a systematic review
(
- Contribution to journal › Scientific review
- 2009
-
Mark
The Neuroanatomic Localization of Epstein-Barr Virus Encephalitis May Be a Predictive Factor for Its Clinical Outcome: A Case Report and Review of 100 Cases in 28 Reports.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article