11 – 20 of 31
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2012
-
Mark
What intent, whose intent and to what extent?: The Knowledge requirement in indirect patent infringement
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
The industrial application requirement for biotech inventions in light of recent EPO & UK case law:: A plausible "hunting license"?"
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2011
-
Mark
US Patent Eligibility in the Wake of Bilski v Kappos: "Business as Usual" in an Age of New Technologies?
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Standing on shaky ground: US patent-eligibility of isolated DNA and genetic diagnostics after AMP v USPTO--Part I
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Contribution to case law summaries and comments: Tri-lingual
2011)(
- Book/Report › Book
-
Mark
Standing on shaky ground: US patent-eligibility of isolated DNA and genetic diagnostics after AMP v USPTO – Part I
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2010
-
Mark
Nanotechnology patents in Europe and the exception from patent for methods for treatment and diagnostic methods
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2009
-
Mark
“Restoring the balance: The patentability of DNA-related technology in the US and Europe”
2009) Scholarship speech prepared for the AWAPATENT Foundation for the Promotion of Scientific Research in the Area of Intellectual Property Rights. p.1-10(
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Paper in conference proceeding
- 2008
-
Mark
Is In re Deuel still the law of the land? The US examination of nonobviousness after KSR v. Teleflex with special emphasis on DNA related inventions
2008) In Historielärarnas Förenings Årsskrift(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Standing in the shadows of Brüstle: ordre public & the patentability of human embryonic stem cell technology in Germany and at the EPO
2008) In Historielärarnas Förenings Årsskrift(
- Contribution to journal › Article