Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Who’s in Charge? Avoiding Human Rights Responsibility in Zambia’s Copper Sector

Bergqvist, Clara LU (2026) SIMZ11 20261
Master of Science in Global Studies
Abstract
This thesis investigates how human rights responsibility is constructed and negotiated between the Zambian state and foreign mining companies in Zambia’s mining sector under conditions of economic dependence on foreign investment. The study is motivated by observations from an internship in Zambia, where mining was consistently framed as central to development while questions of responsibility remained unclear. Against this background, the study asks how the Zambian state and foreign mining companies articulate and negotiate human rights responsibilities within Zambia’s mining sector. While existing research has examined mining governance and corporate responsibility, less attention has been paid to how responsibility is discursively... (More)
This thesis investigates how human rights responsibility is constructed and negotiated between the Zambian state and foreign mining companies in Zambia’s mining sector under conditions of economic dependence on foreign investment. The study is motivated by observations from an internship in Zambia, where mining was consistently framed as central to development while questions of responsibility remained unclear. Against this background, the study asks how the Zambian state and foreign mining companies articulate and negotiate human rights responsibilities within Zambia’s mining sector. While existing research has examined mining governance and corporate responsibility, less attention has been paid to how responsibility is discursively distributed between actors in resource-dependent contexts. The study analyses policy documents, corporate reports, and international assessments from 2019–2025 using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Bacchi’s WPR approach. The findings show that human rights are not constructed as a primary problem within mining governance, but are instead embedded within broader narratives of economic development and investment. Responsibility is systematically displaced, as both state and corporate actors emphasise the limits of their own roles while shifting responsibility onto the other. This produces a governance dynamic in which accountability is fragmented and diffused rather than enforceable, highlighting how economic dependence shapes the ways responsibility is articulated, negotiated, and constrained within Zambia’s mining sector. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Bergqvist, Clara LU
supervisor
organization
alternative title
A critical discourse analysis of state–corporate relations under conditions of economic dependence
course
SIMZ11 20261
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Human rights responsibility, Mining governance, Foreign investment, Copper, Zambia
language
English
id
9235186
date added to LUP
2026-06-25 09:10:55
date last changed
2026-06-25 09:10:55
@misc{9235186,
  abstract     = {{This thesis investigates how human rights responsibility is constructed and negotiated between the Zambian state and foreign mining companies in Zambia’s mining sector under conditions of economic dependence on foreign investment. The study is motivated by observations from an internship in Zambia, where mining was consistently framed as central to development while questions of responsibility remained unclear. Against this background, the study asks how the Zambian state and foreign mining companies articulate and negotiate human rights responsibilities within Zambia’s mining sector. While existing research has examined mining governance and corporate responsibility, less attention has been paid to how responsibility is discursively distributed between actors in resource-dependent contexts. The study analyses policy documents, corporate reports, and international assessments from 2019–2025 using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Bacchi’s WPR approach. The findings show that human rights are not constructed as a primary problem within mining governance, but are instead embedded within broader narratives of economic development and investment. Responsibility is systematically displaced, as both state and corporate actors emphasise the limits of their own roles while shifting responsibility onto the other. This produces a governance dynamic in which accountability is fragmented and diffused rather than enforceable, highlighting how economic dependence shapes the ways responsibility is articulated, negotiated, and constrained within Zambia’s mining sector.}},
  author       = {{Bergqvist, Clara}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Who’s in Charge? Avoiding Human Rights Responsibility in Zambia’s Copper Sector}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}