Policy Reporting to UNESCO: An Analysis
(2026) SIMZ51 20261Master of Science in Social Scientific Data Analysis
- Abstract
- As one of the United Nations’ specialized agencies UNESCO encourages countries to further development in regard to preserve culture, education and science. These obligations are fixed within frameworks. To fulfil the 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions(CoCE), countries should report cultural policies and measures to UNESCO. Despite these reporting obligations, there is variation in countries’ reporting behaviour. This study examines how institutional and socioeconomic factors shape countries’ reporting of policies to UNESCO between 2012 and 2024. Using a country-year dataset combining UNESCO, V-Dem and World Bank data, the analysis estimates Poisson, negative binomial and logistic... (More)
- As one of the United Nations’ specialized agencies UNESCO encourages countries to further development in regard to preserve culture, education and science. These obligations are fixed within frameworks. To fulfil the 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions(CoCE), countries should report cultural policies and measures to UNESCO. Despite these reporting obligations, there is variation in countries’ reporting behaviour. This study examines how institutional and socioeconomic factors shape countries’ reporting of policies to UNESCO between 2012 and 2024. Using a country-year dataset combining UNESCO, V-Dem and World Bank data, the analysis estimates Poisson, negative binomial and logistic regression models to examine the extent as well as the intensity of reporting. The findings provide only limited support for the hypotheses that richer and more democratic countries are more likely to report cultural policies. Civil participation and the interaction between economic development and corruption provide also limited evidence. Overall, however, the findings indicate that institutional factors might provide more fitting explanations for UNESCO policy reporting than economic development or regime type alone. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9249845
- author
- Nippert, Natalja LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- SIMZ51 20261
- year
- 2026
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- UNESCO, cultural policy, policy reporting, regression analysis, institutional capacity
- language
- English
- id
- 9249845
- date added to LUP
- 2026-09-02 15:33:03
- date last changed
- 2026-09-02 15:33:03
@misc{9249845,
abstract = {{As one of the United Nations’ specialized agencies UNESCO encourages countries to further development in regard to preserve culture, education and science. These obligations are fixed within frameworks. To fulfil the 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions(CoCE), countries should report cultural policies and measures to UNESCO. Despite these reporting obligations, there is variation in countries’ reporting behaviour. This study examines how institutional and socioeconomic factors shape countries’ reporting of policies to UNESCO between 2012 and 2024. Using a country-year dataset combining UNESCO, V-Dem and World Bank data, the analysis estimates Poisson, negative binomial and logistic regression models to examine the extent as well as the intensity of reporting. The findings provide only limited support for the hypotheses that richer and more democratic countries are more likely to report cultural policies. Civil participation and the interaction between economic development and corruption provide also limited evidence. Overall, however, the findings indicate that institutional factors might provide more fitting explanations for UNESCO policy reporting than economic development or regime type alone.}},
author = {{Nippert, Natalja}},
language = {{eng}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Policy Reporting to UNESCO: An Analysis}},
year = {{2026}},
}