Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Epidemiology of aniridia in Sweden and Norway.

Edén, Ulla LU ; Iggman, David ; Riise, Ruth and Tornqvist, Kristina LU (2008) In Acta Ophthalmologica 86. p.727-729
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the epidemiology of aniridia in the populations of Sweden and Norway. Methods: A thorough search for aniridia patients has been performed in Sweden and Norway. All participants had a clinical ophthalmological examination documented through photography. Blood samples were taken for mutation analysis and pedigrees were established. Results: A total of 181 patients with aniridia were identified in the two countries. This gives an age-specific prevalence of 1:72 000 in the entire region, 1:70 000 in Sweden and 1:76 000 in Norway. A total of 124 individuals (69%) were examined. Male/female ratio was 0.94 (Sweden 0.85 and Norway 1.2). Mean age of the examined patients was 29 years and median age 25 years. We did not find... (More)
Purpose: To investigate the epidemiology of aniridia in the populations of Sweden and Norway. Methods: A thorough search for aniridia patients has been performed in Sweden and Norway. All participants had a clinical ophthalmological examination documented through photography. Blood samples were taken for mutation analysis and pedigrees were established. Results: A total of 181 patients with aniridia were identified in the two countries. This gives an age-specific prevalence of 1:72 000 in the entire region, 1:70 000 in Sweden and 1:76 000 in Norway. A total of 124 individuals (69%) were examined. Male/female ratio was 0.94 (Sweden 0.85 and Norway 1.2). Mean age of the examined patients was 29 years and median age 25 years. We did not find any significant age difference between the two countries. The mean visual acuity (VA) was 0.19 (Sweden 0.19 and Norway 0.18).The number of families with more than one affected member was 31 and the number of sporadic cases was 40. Conclusion: We have done a thorough search of the literature, but we have found no earlier studies describing aniridia in an entire country and only a few reports from larger areas. We assume that most aniridia patients have been found and the aniridia prevalence of 1:72 000 can be regarded as well supported. Further studies on other aspects of aniridia are in progress, and information from these can contribute to guidelines for the care of patients with this rare but serious disease. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Acta Ophthalmologica
volume
86
pages
727 - 729
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • wos:000260527200005
  • pmid:18494745
  • scopus:55449136509
  • pmid:18494745
ISSN
1755-3768
DOI
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01309.x
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
2c2a935e-5dd2-4adb-b3b9-00564cbfe9ee (old id 1153891)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18494745?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2016-04-04 07:53:22
date last changed
2022-01-29 02:43:39
@article{2c2a935e-5dd2-4adb-b3b9-00564cbfe9ee,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: To investigate the epidemiology of aniridia in the populations of Sweden and Norway. Methods: A thorough search for aniridia patients has been performed in Sweden and Norway. All participants had a clinical ophthalmological examination documented through photography. Blood samples were taken for mutation analysis and pedigrees were established. Results: A total of 181 patients with aniridia were identified in the two countries. This gives an age-specific prevalence of 1:72 000 in the entire region, 1:70 000 in Sweden and 1:76 000 in Norway. A total of 124 individuals (69%) were examined. Male/female ratio was 0.94 (Sweden 0.85 and Norway 1.2). Mean age of the examined patients was 29 years and median age 25 years. We did not find any significant age difference between the two countries. The mean visual acuity (VA) was 0.19 (Sweden 0.19 and Norway 0.18).The number of families with more than one affected member was 31 and the number of sporadic cases was 40. Conclusion: We have done a thorough search of the literature, but we have found no earlier studies describing aniridia in an entire country and only a few reports from larger areas. We assume that most aniridia patients have been found and the aniridia prevalence of 1:72 000 can be regarded as well supported. Further studies on other aspects of aniridia are in progress, and information from these can contribute to guidelines for the care of patients with this rare but serious disease.}},
  author       = {{Edén, Ulla and Iggman, David and Riise, Ruth and Tornqvist, Kristina}},
  issn         = {{1755-3768}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{727--729}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Acta Ophthalmologica}},
  title        = {{Epidemiology of aniridia in Sweden and Norway.}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01309.x}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01309.x}},
  volume       = {{86}},
  year         = {{2008}},
}