Endurance Per Se in B-time
(2009) In Metaphysica 10(2). p.175-183- Abstract
- Three arguments for the conclusion that objects cannot endure in B-time even if they remain intrinsically unchanged are examined: Carter and Hestevold’s enduring-objects-as-universals argument (American Philosophical Quarterly 31(4):269–283, 1994) and Barker and Dowe’s paradox 1 and paradox 2 (Analysis 63(2):106–114, 2003, Analysis 65(1):69–74, 2005). All three are shown to fail.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1503762
- author
- Hansson Wahlberg, Tobias LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2009
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- B-time - Endurance - Mereology - Paradox - Persistence - Universals
- in
- Metaphysica
- volume
- 10
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 175 - 183
- publisher
- Springer
- ISSN
- 1437-2053
- DOI
- 10.1007/s12133-009-0049-z
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 003cba96-4049-461d-a2c2-6c239ed7fa36 (old id 1503762)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 11:20:36
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 21:04:12
@article{003cba96-4049-461d-a2c2-6c239ed7fa36,
abstract = {{Three arguments for the conclusion that objects cannot endure in B-time even if they remain intrinsically unchanged are examined: Carter and Hestevold’s enduring-objects-as-universals argument (American Philosophical Quarterly 31(4):269–283, 1994) and Barker and Dowe’s paradox 1 and paradox 2 (Analysis 63(2):106–114, 2003, Analysis 65(1):69–74, 2005). All three are shown to fail.}},
author = {{Hansson Wahlberg, Tobias}},
issn = {{1437-2053}},
keywords = {{B-time - Endurance - Mereology - Paradox - Persistence - Universals}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{175--183}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Metaphysica}},
title = {{Endurance Per Se in B-time}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/5751378/4393987.pdf}},
doi = {{10.1007/s12133-009-0049-z}},
volume = {{10}},
year = {{2009}},
}