Interaction of the EU ETS and national climate policy instruments – Impact on biomass use
(2012) In Biomass & Bioenergy 38(March). p.117-127- Abstract
- Policy-makers apply multiple policy instruments simultaneously in the climate and energy policy field at both EU and Member State levels. This creates interactions between instruments that can be complementary and synergistic but also conflicting. This article focuses on the interactions of climate policy instruments and their impact on biomass use. The objectives are to examine interactions of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) with the main national climate policy instruments and to identify the influence of these on biomass use. The work draws experiences from seven EU countries (Austria, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom), with a special focus on Finland and Sweden. The analysis explores the... (More)
- Policy-makers apply multiple policy instruments simultaneously in the climate and energy policy field at both EU and Member State levels. This creates interactions between instruments that can be complementary and synergistic but also conflicting. This article focuses on the interactions of climate policy instruments and their impact on biomass use. The objectives are to examine interactions of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) with the main national climate policy instruments and to identify the influence of these on biomass use. The work draws experiences from seven EU countries (Austria, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom), with a special focus on Finland and Sweden. The analysis explores the effects of policy interactions and is based on an examination of literature, and interviews with biomass experts in research, industry and policy spheres. Results indicate that the combined effects of climate policy instruments have a tangible impact on biomass use, whereas the causal links to the EU ETS are difficult to assess separately. Policy impacts found include increased competition for biomass resources, changes in fuel mixes and a contribution to upward pressure on wood prices. Differences in these effects are linked to differing national policy mixes and energy-carrier portfolios – an example being the relative differences in the importance of peat to the energy mix in Finland and Sweden. Analysis and comparison of the effects in the selected countries can yield insight on how to improve the design of policy interventions that impact biomass use. This study confirms the importance of identifying interactions between policy instruments so as to recognise – and manage – synergies and conflicts. The development of more synergistic and coordinated policy instrument mixes would also be beneficial for the bioenergy field. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1961686
- author
- Kautto, Niina LU ; Arasto, Antti ; Jos, Sijm and Peck, Philip LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2012
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Policy interaction, Emissions trading, Biomass, Climate policy, Policy instrument
- in
- Biomass & Bioenergy
- volume
- 38
- issue
- March
- pages
- 117 - 127
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000301608700012
- scopus:84856287788
- ISSN
- 1873-2909
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.002
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 45038cfd-0693-42a1-97e4-5e8a40bce5d1 (old id 1961686)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:37:04
- date last changed
- 2022-04-12 07:57:34
@article{45038cfd-0693-42a1-97e4-5e8a40bce5d1,
abstract = {{Policy-makers apply multiple policy instruments simultaneously in the climate and energy policy field at both EU and Member State levels. This creates interactions between instruments that can be complementary and synergistic but also conflicting. This article focuses on the interactions of climate policy instruments and their impact on biomass use. The objectives are to examine interactions of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) with the main national climate policy instruments and to identify the influence of these on biomass use. The work draws experiences from seven EU countries (Austria, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom), with a special focus on Finland and Sweden. The analysis explores the effects of policy interactions and is based on an examination of literature, and interviews with biomass experts in research, industry and policy spheres. Results indicate that the combined effects of climate policy instruments have a tangible impact on biomass use, whereas the causal links to the EU ETS are difficult to assess separately. Policy impacts found include increased competition for biomass resources, changes in fuel mixes and a contribution to upward pressure on wood prices. Differences in these effects are linked to differing national policy mixes and energy-carrier portfolios – an example being the relative differences in the importance of peat to the energy mix in Finland and Sweden. Analysis and comparison of the effects in the selected countries can yield insight on how to improve the design of policy interventions that impact biomass use. This study confirms the importance of identifying interactions between policy instruments so as to recognise – and manage – synergies and conflicts. The development of more synergistic and coordinated policy instrument mixes would also be beneficial for the bioenergy field.}},
author = {{Kautto, Niina and Arasto, Antti and Jos, Sijm and Peck, Philip}},
issn = {{1873-2909}},
keywords = {{Policy interaction; Emissions trading; Biomass; Climate policy; Policy instrument}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{March}},
pages = {{117--127}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Biomass & Bioenergy}},
title = {{Interaction of the EU ETS and national climate policy instruments – Impact on biomass use}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.002}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.002}},
volume = {{38}},
year = {{2012}},
}