How does sampling methodology influence molecular detection and isolation success in influenza a virus field studies?
(2016) In Applied and Environmental Microbiology 82(4). p.1147-1153- Abstract
Wild waterfowl are important reservoir hosts for influenza A virus (IAV) and a potential source of spillover infections in other hosts, including poultry and swine. The emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses, such as H5N1 and H5N8, and subsequent spread along migratory flyways prompted the initiation of several programs in Europe, North America, and Africa to monitor circulation of HPAI and low-pathogenicity precursor viruses (low-pathogenicity avian influenza [LPAI] viruses). Given the costs of maintaining such programs, it is essential to establish best practice for field methodologies to provide robust data for epidemiological interpretation. Here, we use long-term surveillance data from a single site to... (More)
Wild waterfowl are important reservoir hosts for influenza A virus (IAV) and a potential source of spillover infections in other hosts, including poultry and swine. The emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses, such as H5N1 and H5N8, and subsequent spread along migratory flyways prompted the initiation of several programs in Europe, North America, and Africa to monitor circulation of HPAI and low-pathogenicity precursor viruses (low-pathogenicity avian influenza [LPAI] viruses). Given the costs of maintaining such programs, it is essential to establish best practice for field methodologies to provide robust data for epidemiological interpretation. Here, we use long-term surveillance data from a single site to evaluate the influence of a number of parameters on virus detection and isolation of LPAI viruses. A total of 26,586 samples (oropharyngeal, fecal, and cloacal) collected from wild mallards were screened by real-time PCR, and positive samples were subjected to isolation in embryonated chicken eggs. The LPAI virus detection rate was influenced by the sample type: cloacal/fecal samples showed a consistently higher detection rate and lower cycle threshold (Ct) value than oropharyngeal samples. Molecular detection was more sensitive than isolation, and virus isolation success was proportional to the number of RNA copies in the sample. Interestingly, for a given Ct value, the isolation success was lower in samples from adult birds than in those from juveniles. Comparing the results of specific real-time reverse transcriptase (RRT)-PCRs and of isolation, it was clear that coinfections were common in the investigated birds. The effects of sample type and detection methods warrant some caution in interpretation of the surveillance data.
(Less)
- author
- Latorre-Margalef, Neus LU ; Avril, Alexis ; Tolf, Conny ; Olsen, Björn and Waldenström, Jonas LU
- publishing date
- 2016
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- volume
- 82
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 7 pages
- publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:26655759
- scopus:84957916893
- ISSN
- 0099-2240
- DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.03283-15
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 512c5bfe-f897-4562-b420-e012ab466434
- date added to LUP
- 2017-04-11 13:57:16
- date last changed
- 2024-07-21 19:02:31
@article{512c5bfe-f897-4562-b420-e012ab466434,
abstract = {{<p>Wild waterfowl are important reservoir hosts for influenza A virus (IAV) and a potential source of spillover infections in other hosts, including poultry and swine. The emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses, such as H5N1 and H5N8, and subsequent spread along migratory flyways prompted the initiation of several programs in Europe, North America, and Africa to monitor circulation of HPAI and low-pathogenicity precursor viruses (low-pathogenicity avian influenza [LPAI] viruses). Given the costs of maintaining such programs, it is essential to establish best practice for field methodologies to provide robust data for epidemiological interpretation. Here, we use long-term surveillance data from a single site to evaluate the influence of a number of parameters on virus detection and isolation of LPAI viruses. A total of 26,586 samples (oropharyngeal, fecal, and cloacal) collected from wild mallards were screened by real-time PCR, and positive samples were subjected to isolation in embryonated chicken eggs. The LPAI virus detection rate was influenced by the sample type: cloacal/fecal samples showed a consistently higher detection rate and lower cycle threshold (C<sub>t</sub>) value than oropharyngeal samples. Molecular detection was more sensitive than isolation, and virus isolation success was proportional to the number of RNA copies in the sample. Interestingly, for a given C<sub>t</sub> value, the isolation success was lower in samples from adult birds than in those from juveniles. Comparing the results of specific real-time reverse transcriptase (RRT)-PCRs and of isolation, it was clear that coinfections were common in the investigated birds. The effects of sample type and detection methods warrant some caution in interpretation of the surveillance data.</p>}},
author = {{Latorre-Margalef, Neus and Avril, Alexis and Tolf, Conny and Olsen, Björn and Waldenström, Jonas}},
issn = {{0099-2240}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{1147--1153}},
publisher = {{American Society for Microbiology}},
series = {{Applied and Environmental Microbiology}},
title = {{How does sampling methodology influence molecular detection and isolation success in influenza a virus field studies?}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03283-15}},
doi = {{10.1128/AEM.03283-15}},
volume = {{82}},
year = {{2016}},
}