Toward a standard approach to measurement and reporting of perioperative mortality rate as a global indicator for surgery.
(2015) In Surgery 158(1). p.17-26- Abstract
- The proportion of patients who die during or after surgery, otherwise known as the perioperative mortality rate (POMR), is a credible indicator of the safety and quality of operative care. Its accuracy and usefulness as a metric, however, particularly one that enables valid comparisons over time or between jurisdictions, has been limited by lack of a standardized approach to measurement and calculation, poor understanding of when in relation to surgery it is best measured, and whether risk-adjustment is needed. Our aim was to evaluate the value of POMR as a global surgery metric by addressing these issues using 4, large, mixed, surgical datasets that represent high-, middle-, and low-income countries.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5453588
- author
- Ariyaratnam, Roshan ; Palmqvist, Charlotta L ; Hider, Phil ; Laing, Grant L ; Stupart, Douglas ; Wilson, Leona ; Clarke, Damian L ; Hagander, Lars LU ; Watters, David A and Gruen, Russell L
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Surgery
- volume
- 158
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 17 - 26
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:25958067
- wos:000356320400004
- pmid:25958067
- scopus:84938682396
- ISSN
- 1532-7361
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.024
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 4135db93-9556-403c-938e-10f94a02cab6 (old id 5453588)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25958067?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 09:53:12
- date last changed
- 2022-04-19 20:30:29
@article{4135db93-9556-403c-938e-10f94a02cab6, abstract = {{The proportion of patients who die during or after surgery, otherwise known as the perioperative mortality rate (POMR), is a credible indicator of the safety and quality of operative care. Its accuracy and usefulness as a metric, however, particularly one that enables valid comparisons over time or between jurisdictions, has been limited by lack of a standardized approach to measurement and calculation, poor understanding of when in relation to surgery it is best measured, and whether risk-adjustment is needed. Our aim was to evaluate the value of POMR as a global surgery metric by addressing these issues using 4, large, mixed, surgical datasets that represent high-, middle-, and low-income countries.}}, author = {{Ariyaratnam, Roshan and Palmqvist, Charlotta L and Hider, Phil and Laing, Grant L and Stupart, Douglas and Wilson, Leona and Clarke, Damian L and Hagander, Lars and Watters, David A and Gruen, Russell L}}, issn = {{1532-7361}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{17--26}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Surgery}}, title = {{Toward a standard approach to measurement and reporting of perioperative mortality rate as a global indicator for surgery.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.024}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.024}}, volume = {{158}}, year = {{2015}}, }