Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Peer effects in residential solar photovoltaics adoption—A mixed methods study of Swedish users

Palm, Alvar LU (2017) In Energy Research & Social Science 26. p.1-10
Abstract

Neighbourhood peer effects (social influence) in the diffusion of residential solar photovoltaics (PV) have previously been identified and quantified in a number of studies. Yet, little has been known about the inner workings of peer effects in PV diffusion. In the present work, a survey and interviews were used to study peer effects among Swedish PV adopters. Participants acknowledged peer effects as important for their adoption decision, although they had in general been seriously contemplating PV adoption before the effects. The main function of peer effects appears to have been a confirmation that PV works as intended and without hassle, rather than the procreation of unexpected insights or the provision of more advanced... (More)

Neighbourhood peer effects (social influence) in the diffusion of residential solar photovoltaics (PV) have previously been identified and quantified in a number of studies. Yet, little has been known about the inner workings of peer effects in PV diffusion. In the present work, a survey and interviews were used to study peer effects among Swedish PV adopters. Participants acknowledged peer effects as important for their adoption decision, although they had in general been seriously contemplating PV adoption before the effects. The main function of peer effects appears to have been a confirmation that PV works as intended and without hassle, rather than the procreation of unexpected insights or the provision of more advanced information. Peer effects had mainly occurred through existing and rather close social relationships, rather than between neighbours that did not already know each other. Peer effects appear to have reduced barriers related to PV attributes such as low trialability and low observability of the actual results of adoption. The results suggest that passive peer effects (through seeing PV) were less important than active effects (through direct interpersonal contact), and that seeing PV rarely led to direct contact with adopters, a finding that contrast somewhat to previous literature.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Diffusion of innovations, Peer effects, Solar photovoltaics (PV), Word of mouth
in
Energy Research & Social Science
volume
26
pages
10 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000397201500001
  • scopus:85010399648
ISSN
2214-6296
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.008
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
94acead0-9a39-4217-8a8f-70cb9c22f16f
date added to LUP
2017-02-03 07:16:55
date last changed
2024-04-19 19:15:31
@article{94acead0-9a39-4217-8a8f-70cb9c22f16f,
  abstract     = {{<p>Neighbourhood peer effects (social influence) in the diffusion of residential solar photovoltaics (PV) have previously been identified and quantified in a number of studies. Yet, little has been known about the inner workings of peer effects in PV diffusion. In the present work, a survey and interviews were used to study peer effects among Swedish PV adopters. Participants acknowledged peer effects as important for their adoption decision, although they had in general been seriously contemplating PV adoption before the effects. The main function of peer effects appears to have been a confirmation that PV works as intended and without hassle, rather than the procreation of unexpected insights or the provision of more advanced information. Peer effects had mainly occurred through existing and rather close social relationships, rather than between neighbours that did not already know each other. Peer effects appear to have reduced barriers related to PV attributes such as low trialability and low observability of the actual results of adoption. The results suggest that passive peer effects (through seeing PV) were less important than active effects (through direct interpersonal contact), and that seeing PV rarely led to direct contact with adopters, a finding that contrast somewhat to previous literature.</p>}},
  author       = {{Palm, Alvar}},
  issn         = {{2214-6296}},
  keywords     = {{Diffusion of innovations; Peer effects; Solar photovoltaics (PV); Word of mouth}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{04}},
  pages        = {{1--10}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Energy Research & Social Science}},
  title        = {{Peer effects in residential solar photovoltaics adoption—A mixed methods study of Swedish users}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.008}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.008}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}