Flowing fluid electrical conductivity logging of a deep borehole during and following drilling: estimation of transmissivity, water salinity and hydraulic head of conductive zones
(2017) In Hydrogeology Journal 25(2). p.501-517- Abstract
Flowing fluid electrical conductivity (FFEC) logging is a hydrogeologic testing method that is usually conducted in an existing borehole. However, for the 2,500-m deep COSC-1 borehole, drilled at Åre, central Sweden, it was done within the drilling period during a scheduled 1-day break, thus having a negligible impact on the drilling schedule, yet providing important information on depths of hydraulically conductive zones and their transmissivities and salinities. This paper presents a reanalysis of this set of data together with a new FFEC logging data set obtained soon after drilling was completed, also over a period of 1 day, but with a different pumping rate and water-level drawdown. Their joint analysis not only results in better... (More)
Flowing fluid electrical conductivity (FFEC) logging is a hydrogeologic testing method that is usually conducted in an existing borehole. However, for the 2,500-m deep COSC-1 borehole, drilled at Åre, central Sweden, it was done within the drilling period during a scheduled 1-day break, thus having a negligible impact on the drilling schedule, yet providing important information on depths of hydraulically conductive zones and their transmissivities and salinities. This paper presents a reanalysis of this set of data together with a new FFEC logging data set obtained soon after drilling was completed, also over a period of 1 day, but with a different pumping rate and water-level drawdown. Their joint analysis not only results in better estimates of transmissivity and salinity in the conducting fractures intercepted by the borehole, but also yields the hydraulic head values of these fractures, an important piece of information for the understanding of hydraulic structure of the subsurface. Two additional FFEC logging tests were done about 1 year later, and are used to confirm and refine this analysis. Results show that from 250 to 2,000 m depths, there are seven distinct hydraulically conductive zones with different hydraulic heads and low transmissivity values. For the final test, conducted with a much smaller water-level drawdown, inflow ceased from some of the conductive zones, confirming that their hydraulic heads are below the hydraulic head measured in the wellbore under non-pumped conditions. The challenges accompanying 1-day FFEC logging are summarized, along with lessons learned in addressing them.
(Less)
- author
- Doughty, Christine ; Tsang, Chin Fu ; Rosberg, Jan Erik LU ; Juhlin, Christopher ; Dobson, Patrick F. and Birkholzer, Jens T.
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017-03
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Drilling, Fractured rock, Hydraulic head, Hydraulic testing, Well logging
- in
- Hydrogeology Journal
- volume
- 25
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 17 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000395001300015
- scopus:85000443571
- ISSN
- 1431-2174
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10040-016-1497-5
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- fdc907a7-ff45-47bd-ac45-2236e75df453
- date added to LUP
- 2016-12-19 07:46:07
- date last changed
- 2024-04-05 11:32:39
@article{fdc907a7-ff45-47bd-ac45-2236e75df453,
abstract = {{<p>Flowing fluid electrical conductivity (FFEC) logging is a hydrogeologic testing method that is usually conducted in an existing borehole. However, for the 2,500-m deep COSC-1 borehole, drilled at Åre, central Sweden, it was done within the drilling period during a scheduled 1-day break, thus having a negligible impact on the drilling schedule, yet providing important information on depths of hydraulically conductive zones and their transmissivities and salinities. This paper presents a reanalysis of this set of data together with a new FFEC logging data set obtained soon after drilling was completed, also over a period of 1 day, but with a different pumping rate and water-level drawdown. Their joint analysis not only results in better estimates of transmissivity and salinity in the conducting fractures intercepted by the borehole, but also yields the hydraulic head values of these fractures, an important piece of information for the understanding of hydraulic structure of the subsurface. Two additional FFEC logging tests were done about 1 year later, and are used to confirm and refine this analysis. Results show that from 250 to 2,000 m depths, there are seven distinct hydraulically conductive zones with different hydraulic heads and low transmissivity values. For the final test, conducted with a much smaller water-level drawdown, inflow ceased from some of the conductive zones, confirming that their hydraulic heads are below the hydraulic head measured in the wellbore under non-pumped conditions. The challenges accompanying 1-day FFEC logging are summarized, along with lessons learned in addressing them.</p>}},
author = {{Doughty, Christine and Tsang, Chin Fu and Rosberg, Jan Erik and Juhlin, Christopher and Dobson, Patrick F. and Birkholzer, Jens T.}},
issn = {{1431-2174}},
keywords = {{Drilling; Fractured rock; Hydraulic head; Hydraulic testing; Well logging}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{501--517}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Hydrogeology Journal}},
title = {{Flowing fluid electrical conductivity logging of a deep borehole during and following drilling: estimation of transmissivity, water salinity and hydraulic head of conductive zones}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1497-5}},
doi = {{10.1007/s10040-016-1497-5}},
volume = {{25}},
year = {{2017}},
}