Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool : Evaluation of the Chinese version of P-CAT
(2020) In BMJ Open 10(7).- Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties.
DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made.
SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China.
PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff.
RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component... (More)
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties.
DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made.
SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China.
PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff.
RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91-0.94 for the scales and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95).
CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context.
(Less)- Abstract (Swedish)
- Objective: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT)and evaluate its psychometric properties. Design: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. Setting: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. Participants: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. Main outcome measure(s): Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test–retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. Results: The factor analysis resulted in a... (More)
- Objective: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT)and evaluate its psychometric properties. Design: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. Setting: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. Participants: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. Main outcome measure(s): Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test–retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. Results: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91–0.94 for the scales and a test–retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95). Conclusion: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context. (Less)
- author
- Le, Cai ; Ma, Ke ; Tang, Pingfen ; Edvardsson, David ; Behm, Lina ; Zhang, Jie ; Yang, Jiqun ; Fu, Haiyan and Ahlström, Gerd LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-07-13
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Person-centered care, older people, palliative care, instrument evaluation, factor analysis
- in
- BMJ Open
- volume
- 10
- issue
- 7
- article number
- e031580
- publisher
- BMJ Publishing Group
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85088041099
- pmid:32665340
- ISSN
- 2044-6055
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
- id
- ff4ffa84-33ec-4c89-a5fd-62bd99fa4518
- date added to LUP
- 2020-07-20 10:05:24
- date last changed
- 2024-07-24 22:25:29
@article{ff4ffa84-33ec-4c89-a5fd-62bd99fa4518, abstract = {{<p>OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p>DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made.</p><p>SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China.</p><p>PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey.</p><p>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff.</p><p>RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91-0.94 for the scales and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95).</p><p>CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context.</p>}}, author = {{Le, Cai and Ma, Ke and Tang, Pingfen and Edvardsson, David and Behm, Lina and Zhang, Jie and Yang, Jiqun and Fu, Haiyan and Ahlström, Gerd}}, issn = {{2044-6055}}, keywords = {{Person-centered care, older people, palliative care, instrument evaluation, factor analysis}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{07}}, number = {{7}}, publisher = {{BMJ Publishing Group}}, series = {{BMJ Open}}, title = {{Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool : Evaluation of the Chinese version of P-CAT}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580}}, doi = {{10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580}}, volume = {{10}}, year = {{2020}}, }