Consociationalism as Peacebuilding in Syria
(2021) SIMV07 20211Graduate School
Department of Political Science
Education
Master of Science in Global Studies
- Abstract
- The sectarian civil war in Syria is one of the most entrenched civil wars in contemporary time and has proven hard to resolute, despite various attempts by international actors. A power-sharing system of consociationalism has often been proposed, given its ability to divide the power between sectarian groups and allocate stability within a political system. Through discourse analysis, this thesis explores how a consociational system is possible in Syria based on the negotiations of the OSES’ current constitutional committee. This thesis argues that consociationalism can, to some degree, provide Syria with a temporary state of stability, for which sustainable peace and de-sectarian measures can be implemented and adapted over time. This is... (More)
- The sectarian civil war in Syria is one of the most entrenched civil wars in contemporary time and has proven hard to resolute, despite various attempts by international actors. A power-sharing system of consociationalism has often been proposed, given its ability to divide the power between sectarian groups and allocate stability within a political system. Through discourse analysis, this thesis explores how a consociational system is possible in Syria based on the negotiations of the OSES’ current constitutional committee. This thesis argues that consociationalism can, to some degree, provide Syria with a temporary state of stability, for which sustainable peace and de-sectarian measures can be implemented and adapted over time. This is also seen through the involvement of civil society, which, through their expertise, adequately can highlight and problematise key issues within the political process. Moreover, the element of federalism within consociationalism can provide the country with an opportunity to de-centralise the power. This will furthermore minimise the risk for dissatisfaction within the sectarian divided population. There have, however, been aspects where consociationalism does not seem plausible. This is, among other things, seen through the construction of the opposition, as they are perceived as one homogenous unit, and not as the plural collection of actors within the conflict. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9064240
- author
- Holm, Kathrine Ellersgaard LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- Exploring the political power-sharing system from Iraq and Lebanon based on the OSES’ Constitutional Committee’s negotiations
- course
- SIMV07 20211
- year
- 2021
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- Syrian civil war, sectarianism, consociationalism, power-sharing, federalism, civil society, identity formation, foreign intervention
- language
- English
- id
- 9064240
- date added to LUP
- 2021-09-14 15:26:17
- date last changed
- 2021-09-14 15:26:17
@misc{9064240, abstract = {{The sectarian civil war in Syria is one of the most entrenched civil wars in contemporary time and has proven hard to resolute, despite various attempts by international actors. A power-sharing system of consociationalism has often been proposed, given its ability to divide the power between sectarian groups and allocate stability within a political system. Through discourse analysis, this thesis explores how a consociational system is possible in Syria based on the negotiations of the OSES’ current constitutional committee. This thesis argues that consociationalism can, to some degree, provide Syria with a temporary state of stability, for which sustainable peace and de-sectarian measures can be implemented and adapted over time. This is also seen through the involvement of civil society, which, through their expertise, adequately can highlight and problematise key issues within the political process. Moreover, the element of federalism within consociationalism can provide the country with an opportunity to de-centralise the power. This will furthermore minimise the risk for dissatisfaction within the sectarian divided population. There have, however, been aspects where consociationalism does not seem plausible. This is, among other things, seen through the construction of the opposition, as they are perceived as one homogenous unit, and not as the plural collection of actors within the conflict.}}, author = {{Holm, Kathrine Ellersgaard}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Consociationalism as Peacebuilding in Syria}}, year = {{2021}}, }