Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Contagion, Contention, and Content: Political Mobilization on Telegram in the 2020 Belarusian post-Election Protests

Wassberg, Vide LU (2022) MIDM19 20221
Department of Human Geography
LUMID International Master programme in applied International Development and Management
Abstract
This study aims to scrutinize the role of the social media application Telegram as a protest mobilizing structure during the 2020 post-election uprising in Minsk, Belarus. The purpose is to strengthen the understanding on how protest mobilizations online relate to offline protest participation in authoritarian states, and how the usage of social media in social movements impact, and is influenced by, its authoritarian context. The study utilizes an abductive, qualitative research approach, relying on semi-structured, in-depth, virtual interview data. The study found that Telegram was a decentralized and central mobilizing structure, supplying popular protest opportunities. The amount, speed of information, and tight fit with audiences’... (More)
This study aims to scrutinize the role of the social media application Telegram as a protest mobilizing structure during the 2020 post-election uprising in Minsk, Belarus. The purpose is to strengthen the understanding on how protest mobilizations online relate to offline protest participation in authoritarian states, and how the usage of social media in social movements impact, and is influenced by, its authoritarian context. The study utilizes an abductive, qualitative research approach, relying on semi-structured, in-depth, virtual interview data. The study found that Telegram was a decentralized and central mobilizing structure, supplying popular protest opportunities. The amount, speed of information, and tight fit with audiences’ protest demands made it efficient. Online Telegram mobilization and offline protest action was seen as complementing and interlinked. The mobilizing aspect of public Telegram channels was the usability of the information available, governed by a process of socialization in private chats and groups, showing the coexistence of weak and strong social ties online. The study findings point towards an interaction of online and offline repression in Belarus. While dissidents are not passive targets of digital authoritarianism, repression was capable of both impeding and driving protest mobilization online and offline. The complementarity of mobilization on Telegram was its constructive features and ability to provide an alternative space for action for highly repressed offline mobilization. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Wassberg, Vide LU
supervisor
organization
course
MIDM19 20221
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Telegram, Belarus, Protest, Participation, Mobilization, Connective Action
language
English
id
9098321
date added to LUP
2022-09-14 14:02:37
date last changed
2022-09-14 14:02:37
@misc{9098321,
  abstract     = {{This study aims to scrutinize the role of the social media application Telegram as a protest mobilizing structure during the 2020 post-election uprising in Minsk, Belarus. The purpose is to strengthen the understanding on how protest mobilizations online relate to offline protest participation in authoritarian states, and how the usage of social media in social movements impact, and is influenced by, its authoritarian context. The study utilizes an abductive, qualitative research approach, relying on semi-structured, in-depth, virtual interview data. The study found that Telegram was a decentralized and central mobilizing structure, supplying popular protest opportunities. The amount, speed of information, and tight fit with audiences’ protest demands made it efficient. Online Telegram mobilization and offline protest action was seen as complementing and interlinked. The mobilizing aspect of public Telegram channels was the usability of the information available, governed by a process of socialization in private chats and groups, showing the coexistence of weak and strong social ties online. The study findings point towards an interaction of online and offline repression in Belarus. While dissidents are not passive targets of digital authoritarianism, repression was capable of both impeding and driving protest mobilization online and offline. The complementarity of mobilization on Telegram was its constructive features and ability to provide an alternative space for action for highly repressed offline mobilization.}},
  author       = {{Wassberg, Vide}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Contagion, Contention, and Content: Political Mobilization on Telegram in the 2020 Belarusian post-Election Protests}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}